Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate panel OKs gay-marriage ban (FINALLY!!!)
Reuters ^ | May 18, 2006 | Andy Sullivan

Posted on 05/18/2006 2:49:31 PM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 last
To: Recovering_Democrat

It seems to be a mathematical principal (Complex Systems) that social system collapse in sudden, catastrophic shifts in coordinates. It may well be that we have to endure the unendurable pestilence of the left to have the populace see the light and exterminate and/or defuse these moon-bat vermin.


161 posted on 05/20/2006 8:14:56 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Will_Zurmacht
I could go on but you can see there might be other threats to the republic besides the queers across town.

If you examine what adopting the "gay marriage" concept has done to other societies, you might be more suspicious. Basically, in such societies, people stop being married. What's the point? Nuclear families become a thing of the past - how dross. Society rejects a positive, life affirming, life.

But of course, the thing that binds individuals into a life affirming society is the natural family - the tie that binds husband and wife and child is much stronger that the sexual pleasure (and common thrill of perversion) that bonds the queer couple. I am sure that the queer couple would use any child entrusted to their parentage as an object for their sexual gratification. They are clearly self-centered narcissists who have no concern for others (spend a bit of time listening to their life stories). Certainly their proclivity for numerous, anonymous partners could clue you in.

A natural parent has an inherent concern for their offspring, and a concern for their mate that far exceeds, and endures way beyond, sexual relief. Things go wrong from time to time, but on the whole it works - yield child rearing to queers, and you will get an entirely different thing - I believe that you will be fostering child abuse and societal breakdown on a massive scale.

162 posted on 05/20/2006 9:03:50 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

No flame from me! Excellent post.....


163 posted on 05/21/2006 10:54:15 AM PDT by rockrr (Never argue with a man who buys ammo in bulk...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

STILL waiting for the Constitutional Amendment to protect life.

This is window dressing for the conservative base. And while I agree with establishing this in the Constitution (a marriage must be a marriage regardless of which state you move to), so should when life begins and the worth of a person.

Something that would tackle abortion, euthenasia, "quality of life", cloning, and genetic testing as basis for discrimination in employment or insurance (among other things).


164 posted on 05/21/2006 11:04:28 AM PDT by weegee (Slowly but surely and deliberately, converativism is being made a thoughtcrime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson