Your words are there for all to see. I need lie about nothing.
There is nothing illogical about recognizing the vast increase in firepower and killing ability of modern weapons. Not a week goes by without a story of an innocent killed inadvertently by bullets passing through walls or a ceiling. But reality has no meaning to fanatics.
I insinuate nothing. But boldly state that "shall not infringe" obviously can be infringed not merely for those who have lost rights but also for public safety. There is no right to carry a firearm into a public school, sports venue or even a bar.
As I said there is dispute as to whether the qualification of the First amendment was intended to apply to the others. BTAIM the Law of the Land only applies to those laws enacted under the Constitution by the federal government.
I rest my case.
Your case may as well rest since it is going nowhere being based upon nothing more than your distortions.
Under a strict reading of the Second I could not forbid you from entering my home with a firearm because that would "infringe" upon your right. Criminal gangs cannot be disarmed because that would "infringe" upon their right.
Terrorist bands could not be disarmed because that would "infringe" upon their rights. Classrooms could not forbid pupils bringing guns because the would "infringe" upon their rights. Courtroom could not prevent arms being brought in by spectators because that would "infringe" upon their rights. Drunks or drug addicts could not be disarmed because of the "infringement" of their rights.