It is not I who distort what others write trying to secure Brownie points from the Claque.
I didn't ask you for the argument of the former Attorney General but for any source of discussion during the Constitutional Convention or the ratifiction or amendment debates wrt firearms.
Reading is a breeze as long as you confine yourself to the words actually written rather than those you THINK are there or the INTERPRETATION you place on them. Try it.
Either dispute what is clearly written or it will be universally understood that you do not try because you cannot.
In other words you are simply wrong.