Those are the ones you are talking about banning. You think that it is just peachy for States to do away with despite being signatories to the Constitution and bound by it's limits. As you stated quite clearly in 186 and again in 188.
A citizen militia was one reason for not infringing arms ownership and carry. It wasn't the ONLY reason.
Why do you keep lying about what I said? Does it turn you on?
The ONLY reason given in the Constitution for the right to bear arms IS precisely because of militia requirements.