To: DrDeb; Freee-dame; ColdSpringGirl
This article lists so many accomplishments of the past 5 years, and speaks candidly about the reality of a need for a 60 seat majority in the Senate. Andres praises the House for the many initiatives that they have passed.
Remember my axiom: Look for what is NOT being reported. What drive-by media ignore is where the important news is located. The many conservative bills passed through the House is one more example of this truth.
4 posted on
05/18/2006 5:09:50 AM PDT by
maica
( We have a destination in mind, and that is a freer world. -- G W Bush)
To: maica
the reality of a need for a 60 seat majority in the Senate.Nope. The repubnlicans need simply to force the Rats to an actual filibister every time they threaten to do so. The American public would tire or such childishness very quickly (esp. since the Rats cannot articulate what it is they actually stand for).
8 posted on
05/18/2006 5:11:44 AM PDT by
angkor
To: maica
One of the main problems that I have had with this administration is that we do not tout our accomplishments like Clinton's people did. They started every sentence with a list of things that had been passed, whether they were the ones responsible or not.
37 posted on
05/18/2006 5:52:45 AM PDT by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: maica
a need for a 60 seat majority in the Senate.
We need a 75-seat majority to pass some long-needed constitutional amendments with enough margin to overcome the RINOs.
87 posted on
05/18/2006 7:14:43 AM PDT by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson