[Dahoser]

Great observation, Mia. Nina K is saying don't do us any more socialized medicine favors, Czarina Hellary, just keep wowing the world's worst deliberative body with more of your dazzling work ethic and amendment proposing prowess. Worse yet, she's saying to stand aside for a department store mannequin who's prone to holding global warming meetings on the coldest day of every year. Ouch.

[Mia T]

;)

[Mia T]

Thank you. But scratch 'paints.' Make that 'dismisses.'

Nina Burleigh dismisses 'hillary' as a dull, midlevel technocrat (and I use that word loosely), whose zipper-hoisting ("charm") can take her no higher.

A twist--and, if you'll pardon the double entendre, a pun--on the Peter Principle.

For her entire adult (such as it is) life, zipper-hoisting has been missus clinton's principal means of upward mobility.

Zipper-hoisting has proved to be a sticky wicket for missus clinton, owing not to antithetical feminist ideology, as one would expect -- feminists willingly sacrificed feminism on the altar of clintonism -- but to zipper choice, her rather injudicious attachment early on to a certain zipper habitually on the downslide.

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006