Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pukin Dog
I think a wall is going to be the ultimate outcome of this debate. But I am going to get medieval on the first FReeper who complains about spending if it happens, because that wall will cost some enormous dollars.

I'd be fine with the cost. Then again, I'm not opposed to paying more to hire legal citizens to do my landscaping either.

1,834 posted on 05/17/2006 3:03:38 PM PDT by Bella_Bru (http://folding.stanford.edu/ - - - -Folding@home. Free Republic team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1784 | View Replies ]


To: Bella_Bru
Everyone will certainly be 'fine with the cost' directly, but it is those indirect costs that they don't see that will piss them off. Just like everyone has no problem with current military spending, because they understand what that is. I wonder how many people who use the 'drunken sailor' charge have ever run the numbers to see just how much spending outside of War, Katrina and Medicaid has really increased. Two of those three items were not exactly planned. Eventually, someone is going to get their pet project axed, and watch the bitching begin!
1,867 posted on 05/17/2006 3:09:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1834 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson