Posted on 05/17/2006 7:47:58 AM PDT by Pukin Dog
Edited on 05/17/2006 8:30:59 AM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]
LOL, bye nopardons. You are no longer worth my time. And I must confess I enjoy your posts, I enjoy your wit, and you are one of the more intelect posters on FR. But you have met your match in jpsb. I expected better of you, I expected a serious debate, You disapointed me. Oh well, not many can debate me, should have known better then to expect you could. Once again see ya.
I slipped ya a mickey, so you now should go lay down.
(kidding!)
We the people are the legitimate heirs of the Republic - our representatives enact law which is to be enforced by the Executive. The President has no option in the matter - selective enforcement of the law is a primary definition of corruption.
Bush was a state governor in 1999; he has been the Chief Executive of the United States since 2001. He is personally responsible for carrying out EXISTING enforcement of employment, immigration & labor laws. He has no credibility in this issue.
BTTT
Let's hope there's something left of America in 2008 that we're still able to recognize.
It was relative to other Dems....sorta like Tex Watson being decent compared to John Wayne Gacy..
I could never understand how an Orthodox Jew could be Pro-Choice
I hope that's not a rule. I don't think it's a good one.
If a person makes a comment on this open forum, then that person should expect a response from anybody.
The only requirement should be that the response doesn't brake the rules.
Based on the vast majority of comments supporting the original vanity that started this thread, I think it is you who are out of synch with most members of FR. There is a huge difference between disagreeing on an issue and demanding members of this site don't vote in 2006. There is also a big difference between disagreeing with a President and calling him a treasonous traitor who should be impeached. As someone who still serves in the military, and still recognizes we have a serious job to do protecting this nation from the very real threat of Islamofascists, the biggest obstacle I can see in the future to our success in that war is a Speaker Pelosi and an impeached Commander in Chief.
Illegal immigration is yet one more problem President Bush has inherited from his predecessors. It has taken generations to evolve into its current state. And it will take generations to solve. The American public has become convinced that all problems can be solved overnight. I'm not sure if that is a result of watching too many movies, or spending too much time listening to the MSM, but it isn't true. Whether it is the war on terror, the fight against abortion, undoing our welfare society, or solving illegal immigration, it is going to take time to accomplish the results we are looking for. The fact that some "conservatives" are ready to bail out just when every sign indicates their pet issue is starting to be addressed puts them into the same category as the cut-and-run democrats who want to sign a war on terror peace treaty because Iraq is not yet a Jeffersonian Democracy.
For some people this may just be an opportunity to "make a point" about how important they are. But to thousands of Americans fighting around the world to guarantee the freedom of this country, a democrat congress will mean the difference between ultimate success and failure in a war we are currently winning. And we cannot afford to lose that war. And in the meantime, the problem of illegal immigration is starting to get the attention it deserves. Bush is fighting several wars at once. It sure as hell doesn't help that his supposed "base" has opened another front to his rear.
That would only be funnier if Howlin said it.
LOL...yes, I do. :-)
I am not trying to make you agree with me on anything. Just stating yet another fact, that Toby is not a troll.
And OH YES, you certainly ARE trying to "take me on", which is NOT something you really want to do, dear. ;^)
Stop threatening people.
Spot on!
"lousy politician"....you have that right...but, he is a good man, which is MUCH better.
What I find so bizarre is that so many Republican politicians have been "running away" from him since his poll numbers have been dropping...
BUT, the Republicans in the Senate, that have been running away..have NOT taken up the mantle of hard nosed Borderbots...they haven't said..."close the borders" , "deport the illegals"..."get legislation doing away with anchor babies, NOW"...
No, they aren't...BUT, they continue to not so subtly point out the differences between President Bush and themselves...but, there is always the fudge factor, to where they come back later, if Bush't numbers go up all of a sudden...and can say, "see, I was with Dubya all along"....blech
From the "New American" no doubt.
You mistake criticism of Bush as criticism of the GOP and conservative values. In my case, it's easy to support the GOP, because my Rep has gone on record opposing Bush. Here's what he said about the guest worker bill "The president obviously doesnt think of Americans by passing the bill, said Dana Rohrbacher.
Um. How do you know that if they were banned? Have you been banned before?
Just to say...
Other folks talk back-stage, too.
Yikes.
Your are correct, I mispoke myself the GOP is splite into two camps, the two camps are still defining themselves but one camp is clearly more pragmatic(and wrong) the the other camp is more princibled (and right). How it all ends id beyond my pay grade.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.