Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guard Support at Border Not New Concept, Officials Say
Armed Forces Information Service ^ | 16 May 2006 | Sgt. Sara Wood, USA

Posted on 05/16/2006 4:26:40 PM PDT by surely_you_jest

WASHINGTON, May 16, 2006 – The National Guard has supported operations at the U.S. southern border for years, and the new plan announced by President Bush last night will simply expand those operations, Defense Department officials said here today.

Army Lt. Gen. H Steven Blum (right), chief of the National Guard Bureau, and Paul McHale, assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense, address a joint news conference on border security in Washington, May 16. Photo by Cdr. Jane Campbell, USN

"The National Guard is superbly suited for this mission. We've been doing it for over three decades, just at a much smaller scale," Army Lt. Gen. H Steven Blum, chief of the National Guard Bureau, said at a joint news conference about border security. "We're trained, we're ready to do this, and we're able to do this."

The National Guard has routinely used member's required two-week annual training period to support border control and counterdrug programs at the border, said Paul McHale, assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense.

Under the new deployment plan, the Guard will still use the annual training period, but will be sending more troops, McHale said, and those troops will perform missions consistent with their military skills.

Troops will rotate in and out of the border mission every two to three weeks, Blum said, but the leadership will remain the same for the duration of the operations. The leaders who are there long-term will be from the affected states -- California, Texas, Arizona and New Mexico -- and will be under the control of the joint force headquarters, he said.

The initial commitment will be for up to 6,000 troops on a rotational basis for up to one year, McHale said. For a second year of deployment, military support will not exceed 3,000 personnel, he said.

The National Guard's border missions will include surveillance and reconnaissance, engineering support, transportation support, logistics support, vehicle dismantling, medical support, barrier and infrastructure construction, road building, and linguistics support, McHale said. He emphasized that Guard forces will play no role in the direct apprehension, custodial care or security associated with those who are detained by civilian law enforcement authorities.

"Law enforcement along the border will remain a civilian function," he said.

The Guard deployments along the border are meant to act as a bridge to improve civilian security capabilities, McHale said. Blum agreed, saying the support would help the civilian authorities grow in the areas where they need assistance.

"This will, hopefully, set the conditions for the Customs and Border Patrol law enforcement agencies to do an even more effective job than they're able to do now because of the lack of infrastructure, or the lack of medical support, or the lack of communication support, or the lack of some aviation assets or surveillance platforms or sensors, or the lack of additional support personnel to help them," Blum said.

The National Guard's deployments to the border will not affect its readiness to support the global war on terror and to respond to natural disasters, Blum said. The Guard has more troops and equipment available than last year, and the president's requirements at the border will only use about 2 percent of the force, he said.

Officials from DoD and the Department of Homeland Security will be working this week to determine what missions the Guard will perform, what kind of units are needed, and where they are needed, McHale said. The deployment process should begin in June, he said.

The plan is still in its early stages, but based on similar past missions, DoD is working out the details, McHale said.

"We're building upon past success. And we are reinforcing that success with a much greater number of personnel and a more robust commitment of resources," he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nationalguard
Official DoD release on the deployment of National Guard personnel to the Mexican border. More detail than I have seen mentioned elsewhere.
1 posted on 05/16/2006 4:26:43 PM PDT by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: surely_you_jest
He emphasized that Guard forces will play no role in the direct apprehension, custodial care or security associated with those who are detained by civilian law enforcement authorities.

So, what's the point???

2 posted on 05/16/2006 4:31:41 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

Don't you understand? It's all for show. You're supposed to come away feeling that all the border problems are now solved.

My solution? Don't use the Guard - hire all the aliens sneaking in and pay them the day labor rate to do all that work.


3 posted on 05/16/2006 4:38:18 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

I'm not sure.

What I found interesting is the fact that most of these Guardsmen will be doing this on their Annual Tours, which only last a couple of weeks.

The administrative overhead driven by the fact that this is an Annual Tour may well mean that these troops won't be doing whatever it is that they are sent there to do for very many days. Then there are the travel costs associated with rotating these guys in and out at a fairly rapid tempo.

It seems to me that there may not be a great deal of "bang" for the taxpayers' "buck" here. But it appears that there will be a lot of bucks spent on this. Not exactly what you could call cost-effective.


4 posted on 05/16/2006 4:39:20 PM PDT by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: surely_you_jest
What I found interesting is the fact that most of these Guardsmen will be doing this on their Annual Tours, which only last a couple of weeks.

Still watching the briefing, but looks like it'll be structured like I guessed.  There will be a fulltime cadre with AT Guardsman rotated in according to what is needed.

No mention of how large the cadre (what LG Blum calls a continuity force) will be.  Not much more to know till Chernoff tells the Guard what he needs and the Guard responds to it.

Secretary Michael Chertoff is joined by Border Patrol Chief David Aguilar and others (including NGB Bureau Chief LTG Blum) at a briefing on border security.
5/16/2006: WASHINGTON, DC: 50 min.  Go to C-SPAN's Defense/Security page.

5 posted on 05/16/2006 5:04:05 PM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: surely_you_jest
Annual tour - yep, I caught that too. Seems W doesn't want them there long enough and otherwise occupied to get a feel for what's really happening on the border.
6 posted on 05/16/2006 5:27:48 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: surely_you_jest

"The initial commitment will be for up to 6,000 troops on a rotational basis for up to one year, McHale said. For a second year of deployment, military support will not exceed 3,000 personnel"

--- Just remember ... in Politicalspeak, "up to 6,000 ... up to one year" can equal 1 guy for 1 day


7 posted on 05/16/2006 5:59:10 PM PDT by Casekirchen (Say what you will about the French, but their president at least sees an immigration problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surely_you_jest

JTF-6. The Guard and Reserve have been supporting their mission for decades.


8 posted on 05/16/2006 6:11:02 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson