"Sharks with Frikin Laser Beams!"
Posted on 05/16/2006 2:52:45 PM PDT by Libloather
Rush Talks with Vice President Cheney
May 16, 2006
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: And once again, we are thrilled and honored to have with us the vice president of the United States, Dick Cheney. Mr. Vice President, welcome back. As always, great to have you here.
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, good afternoon, Rush.
RUSH: All right, question: Is the president -- are you and the president, the administration -- aware of the dissatisfaction on the whole issue of illegal immigration that exists, not just within the Republican base but within the country at large?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Yes we are, Rush. In my travels out around the country I've found for a long time now immigration, illegal immigration in particular, to be a big issue, and it's true no matter part of the country you go to. Of course you find it down along the border of Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, but I also was out in the Seattle area the other day and talked to several folks out there, and it was a significant issue up there, too. It takes different forms in different places around the country but it's a tough issue. It's complicated; it's important, and so there are, I think, legitimate concerns out there on the part of a lot of folks.
RUSH: Why do you think so many people -- and I'm just judging from telephone calls I've had and when I make trips to California like you just mentioned, I can't get away from the subject. It's all anybody wants to talk about, particularly in southern California. Why is it that so many people don't think that the steps the president is outlining and has outlined over the years will address the seriousness of the problem?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, I think part of it is that a lot of folks aren't aware of what's already being done. I mean, the president pointed out in his speech for example that since we got into office, we have arrested, turned back, sent back across the border some six million illegals. That's huge number. There's a huge amount of effort that's gone into that. We've had a very significant increase in resources. It's just that the problem is so big, there's still a lot more to be done and to date we've not been successful in getting a comprehensive approach out of the Congress that would allow us to address some of these issues. So we've been doing what we could administratively; we've been doing what we could with appropriations bills but in terms the basic legislation we've still got a ways to go. The House has acted; the Senate has not yet acted, and then of course we'll have to get something out of conference, and what the president did last night was lay out a fairly precise program in terms of what he'd like to see.
RUSH: Well, let's talk about what's going on in the Senate. There are a number of bills there. The compromise bill we're being told is Hagel-Martinez, two Republicans proposing this bill. Robert Rector at Heritage and Senator Sessions, who I know you respect, both did joint analyses of this bill and what they project, using conservative estimates, is anywhere from over the next 20 years 110 to 217 million legal immigrants entering the country and illegals as part of that number being granted legal status. What is the public policy purpose for doing that in these kinds of numbers?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: I haven't seen their analysis, Rush, and at this point, of course, what you have in the House bill is specifically a border-enforcement bill. What you've got in the Senate bill is a bill that goes after border enforcement but also you've got Hagel-Martinez and there's Kennedy-McCain. There are a lot of proposals kicking around. The Senate has not finalized its package yet so we don't know what's going to come out of the conference. Obviously we're going to want to look at it very carefully to make sure it does achieve the objectives the president's talked about.
RUSH: Well, if you haven't seen it, let me give you the bare essentials. Senator Sessions did his own analysis. It's a 614 page bill. I know it's gotta be conferenced, but this is a pretty radical starting point. They have anywhere from 117 to 217 million legal Americans -- that's two-thirds of the population -- over the next 20 years if this bill were to become law and if the president signed it as is. Now, hopefully that --
THE VICE PRESIDENT: These are people who would attain legal status?
RUSH: No, this is a combination of both. This is an increase in the number of legal immigrants as well as added to illegals who would then be made legal over that 20-year time frame and it also allows for exponential growth because these people would be allowed to bring in their family members as well, and one of the big concerns here is the strain this would put on an already stretched social safety welfare net and this sort of thing --
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Mmm-hmm.
RUSH: -- and so these numbers are just striking to me. Add two-thirds of the country's population in 20 years? I don't think we can handle that financially and certainly not in an assimilation way.
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Right. Well, if that's the case I would hope that would inform the debate and that Congress will consider those kinds of impacts very carefully before they finally pass something. We'll certainly weigh in on it.
RUSH: Well, Senator Sessions, I think in floor debate today, spent some time really working the numbers and he thinks most senators aren't even aware of these numbers and he's going to do his best to make them aware during the debate.
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Yeah.
RUSH: So hopefully that's true. Now, let's talk about the National Guard. Six thousand Guardsmen. What's the length of time that it is expected they will be needed?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, the total proposal is to run for one year in terms of using the National Guard, and over that period of time we've added some 3,000 Border Patrol since we got here. We're going to increase that by an additional 6,000. That's a 50% increase in the Border Patrol over where we are today, and the National Guard would be, in effect, to supplement what's there already in terms of the Border Patrol during that period of time while you recruit and train additional Border Patrol officers. That is it's Guardsmen as a temporary measure. Units, it is expected, would go down as part of their regular training rotation, and this would be for up to 6,000 at any one time. The way they'd handle their annual training exercise, would go down in support of the Border Patrol themselves.
RUSH: Let me ask you this on behalf of my audience simply because of a number of e-mails. People don't think that this number of 6,000, which probably will add up to two or 3,000 on duty at any given time, is actually going to make much of an impact. What would you say to them?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, I'd say it's not just about the National Guard. You've already got a large number of folks working down there under the auspices of the Border Patrol. We've got big investments going in now in terms of additional technology, in terms of sensors and aerial vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles and so forth, as well as fences. One of the very useful things the Guard can do is what they did there in San Diego a few years ago when they installed a section of fence there that's turned out to be very effective -- that particular section has been very effective -- basically was built by Guard troops. So there are a lot of things they could do to support the effort and to beef up the effort that's already underway and I think that's the intention with respect to the Guard. It's not a be-all and end-all of the operation. I think a lot of our folks who sign up for military service don't sign up to go stand on the border for two or three years of active duty. But this is a way to use the resources of the National Guard to support the professionals who are otherwise involved in that activity. We think it makes sense. It's been done before to some extent in the counter-narcotics area. It's not a new concept to have the Guard working the border in support of federal officials.
RUSH: As all of you in the administration discuss the issue and formulate a plan, do you ever, has a wall, an actual wall, ever been given serious consideration?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: It is given serious consideration, not a wall, for example, from ocean to ocean. There are a lot of places out there where it doesn't make sense. There are other places where it does. I'm told -- I'm not an expert in this by any means -- that when you get into built-up urban areas fences -- "security barriers" might be a better word for it -- are in fact an important part of the overall plan and need to be part of it. There are other areas where you've got vast spaces out there where you need other kinds of arrangements. You need roads to be able to patrol. You can use remote cameras; you can use unmanned aerial vehicles. It's partly a matter of getting technology into it as well, too. It's a very complicated problem. We're talking just about one piece of it, just the border security part of it. But you've also got to address, I think, some of the basic economic incentives that attract people in the first place: all those folks who want to come here for the jobs that they can find working in the United States for a lot more than they can make in Mexico or someplace in Central America. We think you've got to address all those aspects and facets of the problem, and where appropriate fences or security barriers make good sense, but I think the experts got to go through and figure out what's the best technique or procedure for each part of the border.
RUSH: Let me ask you a quick political question, two prongs to it. The Dubai Ports deal. The American people spoke out loudly against it: "We don't want any part of it." It got killed. The illegal immigration deal is generating just as much negative response, but the American people are not getting the reaction, the same reaction from government to that that they got on the Dubai Ports deal. A little confused, asking questions: What's different here? We're still talking security. The second thing is, Democrats, Mr. Vice President, frankly, are getting away with being total bystanders and spectators on this. They offer no solution themselves, yet they continue to sit around and criticize the administration and the Republicans over this. Is there a plan to deal with them politically on this?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well! (chuckles) It is a very tough issue. There's no question about it. You mentioned the Dubai Ports deal, Rush. That created a firestorm of controversy, and so Congress quickly backed provisions that would have made it impossible to go forward, and of course the folks at Dubai Ports withdrew their proposal. The fact is that, from the perspective of United Arab Emirates and so forth -- I worked closely with those folks. They have been very good allies of ours, and I don't want to go back and redo the whole Dubai Ports operation. But the fact of the matter is I thought there was a very strong emotional reaction there. I can understand the emotional reaction, but it didn't bear much resemblance to the basic fundamental facts. What we have here... I mean, I suppose there's a difference between trying to govern and solve a major problem which is what the president and those of us who work for him are trying to do, versus the Democrats, in this case, who don't have any responsibilities or at least aren't willing to take any responsibilities, willing to sit on the sidelines and take potshots. This is an important problem for us to deal with. We've got some 11 or 12 million illegals in the country. It is a national security problem. It's also an economic problem. If you could round all those folks up tomorrow and put them back over the border, you'd have a big hole in your workforce. It is not an easy, simple proposition. If it was, it would have been solved a long time ago. It's one of those tough, intractable problems where you're going to make progress three yards and a cloud of dust. We need to get started. We need to get the border secured. That's our top priority. But then we also need to deal with other aspects of the problem.
RUSH: Mr. Vice President, thanks for your time. I wish we had a little bit more but I know you're on a tight schedule and it's thrill whatever time we have with you, whenever. So thanks very much for being with us now, and we look forward to the next time.
THE VICE PRESIDENT: All right, it's good to talk to you, Rush. You render a great service out there by hosting these debates.
RUSH: Thank you, sir, very much.
Got to agree with Soul Seeker.
The President's comments in the past make it clear that he's ok with lax immigration. The reaction to the minutemen confirm that.
The President may have increased men on the Border but the results over the last 6 years are that they have been stunningly ineffective. It's hard to believe that they could have been that ineffective without a wink and a nod from the top.
When one solitary bust of Illegals in ohio makes national news, something is seriously wrong.
When they talk about putting guards on the border but not letting them patrol. They are telegraphing their intent not to take this serious.
If the Senate 'compromise' passes, illegals will have more rights than legals. A revolt maybe near...
What an ignorant comment. Mexicans are more pro-family than Americans in general. That's been part of the problem with illegals. They insist on bringing the entire family with them over time.
You need that river for what - exactly?
Ewwww - I know. Let's find a compromise. How about a wall smack-dab in the middle of the Rio? That satisfies everyone - no?
"Sharks with Frikin Laser Beams!"
That wasn't a reaction to the Minutemen. Look at the actual interview.
The President may have increased men on the Border but the results over the last 6 years are that they have been stunningly ineffective. It's hard to believe that they could have been that ineffective without a wink and a nod from the top.
What's the proof of this?
When one solitary bust of Illegals in ohio makes national news, something is seriously wrong.
With the media coverage. This subject hasn't been a hot issue in the news, ever. Only now with the May Day crap has it been. So why be surprised that only now is it being reported on, when no one's cared--certainly not the MSM.
When they talk about putting guards on the border but not letting them patrol. They are telegraphing their intent not to take this serious.
But it hasn't happened and we're already complaining about it.
Bush is a man who sticks by his principles. If he is going to do this, he's going to do it. In the past 24 hours he's gone from 0 to 6000 NG on the ground and the promise of a wall.
I'm just not getting this whole "We haven't talked about this for six years but we want it NOW!" trend.
This is not going to be good enough for some on FR. If the President had said he was going to have built a 12 ft high concrete wall a thousand mile long, you would hear, THAT"S NOT GOOD ENOUGH, it should be 14 feet high and 3000 miles long.
that deserves a lol
I wasn't talking about the interview. I was talking about reactions to the minutemen in the past.
"What's the proof of this?"
Look Around, it's obvious.
So why be surprised that only now is it being reported on, when no one's cared--certainly not the MSM.
It's not being reported, because there is nothing to report on. Nobody is making arrests, because nobody thinks the system will actually do anything.
"Bush is a man who sticks by his principles. If he is going to do this, he's going to do it. In the past 24 hours he's gone from 0 to 6000 NG on the ground and the promise of a wall. "
I'd like to believe this, but on this one issue, he has failed us. A change would be nice, but I'm not convinced given his total disregard of this duty prior till now. And his speech still has a lot of mealy mouth talk in it. I agree with Joseph Farrah's analysis of Bush's speech.
"But it hasn't happened and we're already complaining about it. "
They did say they wouldn't be allowed to patrol. So why shouldn't we take them at their word. They've told us clearly they are going to limit the activities of the 6000 to surveillance and road and barrier construction. Why shouldn't we believe them and complain if that is insufficient? How can you say that? You've been on FR since at least 2004 and you know it's been discussed. Granted the country was a little distracted in 2001-2003 with the War on Terror, but even then there were a lot of people point to the borders and yelling "SECURITY BREACH".
"I'm just not getting this whole "We haven't talked about this for six years but we want it NOW!" trend."
You have been on FR since at least early 2004 and you haven't seen this discussed?!!! Since 2001 there have been a ton of folks pointing to the border and yelling "SECURITY BREACH".
How long have the minutemen been operating? How long do you think we were fed up before they started?
It's not a case of not talking about it for 6 years. It's a case of talking about it and seeing nothing done for 6 years. In fact the problem has gotten noticeably worse.
I don't believe I addressed Mexicans or Mexican families. You did.
As a matter of fact, I addressed Americans and American familes.
Chill out.
You're going to sit there and say that immigration was anything more than an occasional discussion around here? You're expecting anyone to think this level of "debate" has been going on since Bush entered office?
I've been here since 2001 and that's bull. Now and then someone would post an article, and that's it.
Look Around, it's obvious.
OK, no facts required--we "just know".
Yeah, ok.
It's been more than a casual discussion. But there were other pressing issues, such as the War. However, it's reached this level, both because we are finally fed up, and because foreigners are now demonstrating on our soil and making demands, and because our Congress keeps tossing around the idea of granting both amnesty and citizenship to all of these illegals.
BTW this evening the Senate reached a compromise and it's expected to pass tomorrow -- they've decided along with everything else it's okay to allow felons to stay in the USA.
The Hagel-Martinez Bill calculates out to about 196 million immigrants over the next 10-20 years. Our current population is 300 million, so we will grow by 2/3 -- all Hispanic.
Atomic possum is in charge.........
Because according to Bush's speech, we can turn back 6 million, but 12 million is an impossible task.
According to Bush's speech, we can turn back 6 million, but 12 million is an impossible task.
According to Bush's speech, we can turn back 6 million, but 12 million is an impossible task.
Dr. Evil: Here's the plan. We get the warhead, and we hold the world ransomed for.....One MILLION DOLLARS!!
No.2: Ahem...well, don't you think we should maybe ask for *more* than a million dollars? I mean, a million dollars isn't exactly a lot of money these days. Virtucon alone makes over nine billion dollars a year!
Dr. Evil: Really?
No.2: Mm-hmm.
Dr. Evil: That's a number. Okay then. We hold the world ransom for.....One hundred..BILLION DOLLARS!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.