Skip to comments.
Mexico Threatens Suits Over Guard Patrols
Las Vegas Sun ^
| May 16, 2006 at 14:11:22 PDT
| MARINA MONTEMAYOR
Posted on 05/16/2006 2:15:57 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 261-271 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Finally someone threatens the suits! Now we'll see action!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Wow! Bush's speech really put the fear of God into Mexico didn't it?
Hey man! You just try to enforce your laws, protect your own borders, use your military to perform the fundamental role of ANY nation's military -- and we will sue the pants off of you!
The sad part of it is that there are plenty of lawyers who will take the cases as well as plenty of publicity-hungry Clinton-era judicial appointees who will rule in their favor. They really could tie the whole thing up in knots this way.
It's too early in the week to get drunk, I am too old to cry, I think I am just going to pound my head against the wall for a while.
62
posted on
05/16/2006 2:38:09 PM PDT
by
Ronin
(Ut iusta esse, lex noblis severus necesse est.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I knew that.
63
posted on
05/16/2006 2:38:53 PM PDT
by
evets
(Dude.)
To: conservativebabe
No, remember, things are getting done but we're just whining & lying.
64
posted on
05/16/2006 2:38:54 PM PDT
by
Millee
(Tagline free)
To: BlueStateDepression
This is a good example of how this issue relates to the war on terrorism. Both Al Qaeda and Mexico are now attempting to use our own laws against us for their benefit and our detriment. What they could not win militarily they will take through sedition.
65
posted on
05/16/2006 2:39:00 PM PDT
by
Ben Mugged
(If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank a soldier.)
To: SwinneySwitch
"South
Taxes Ping!"
Freudian slip?
66
posted on
05/16/2006 2:39:22 PM PDT
by
cll
(Carthage must be destroyed)
To: BlueStateDepression
If the bench rules in Mexico's favor then the American people will be excercising their second ammendment rights to the tune that no politician could calm. Not.
The American people have grown so apathetic that most have totally forgotten what the events of 9/11 told us. I am disappointed with my fellow Americans beyond words. They wouldn't do a thing.
67
posted on
05/16/2006 2:39:32 PM PDT
by
Spiff
("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
We started taking orders from these people when, exactly?
68
posted on
05/16/2006 2:39:50 PM PDT
by
truthkeeper
(It's the borders, stupid.)
To: tomahawk
Your country has been sold. Bush is a con man. This problem has existed for over 30 years. Let us not lay all the blame on Bush.
69
posted on
05/16/2006 2:40:25 PM PDT
by
Ben Mugged
(If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank a soldier.)
To: texas_mrs; dhs12345
They would say "We're not talking about OUR immigration policies, we're talking about YOUR immigration policies. Don't try to change the subject."
This is going to get even more interesting when the angry mexicans elect Obrador in July.
70
posted on
05/16/2006 2:40:30 PM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Omnibus Gloria Fugit)
To: Political Junkie Too
"Mexican border officials also said they worried that sending troops to heavily trafficked regions would push illegal migrants into more perilous areas of the U.S.-Mexican border to avoid detection."
Notice in that statement that the entire tenor of it is not the sanctity of the border, but that our actions might be an impediment to illegal crossings - as if, how dare we impede such noble activity.
This, this attidtude from Mexico, is every U.S. President's fault and Bush has been no help with it.
71
posted on
05/16/2006 2:41:00 PM PDT
by
Wuli
To: Ben Mugged
This problem has existed for over 30 years. Let us not lay all the blame on Bush.A failure is a failure.
72
posted on
05/16/2006 2:41:21 PM PDT
by
Wormwood
(Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
To: Ben Mugged
Well I do not know that they will suceed in that effort but they sure are trying. Time for Americans to stand up and say in the words of roberto durante "MO MAS!"
To: onyx eyes
if I go on another person's property, myself, and that person objects, that the next thing that happens is that I get warned and depending on circumstances, maybe thrown in jail for Breaking The Law But isn't that where a lot of this started? When burglars started being able to sue for damages if they got hurt while burgling a residence?
74
posted on
05/16/2006 2:41:50 PM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Omnibus Gloria Fugit)
To: Spiff
Well maybe I still have more faith remaining in my countrymen than you do.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Pinch me. Am I in a parallel universe?
76
posted on
05/16/2006 2:43:22 PM PDT
by
hispanarepublicana
(Don't fall for the soft bigotry of assuming all Hispanics are pro-amnesty. www.dontspeakforme.org)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"If there is a real wave of rights abuses, if we see the National Guard starting to directly participate in detaining people ... we would immediately start filing lawsuits through our consulates," Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto Derbez told a Mexico City radio station. He did not offer further details. Is this guy nuts?
77
posted on
05/16/2006 2:43:45 PM PDT
by
Former Proud Canadian
(How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This sounds like part of the plan. If our government does not back down and the Mexican government does then conservatives will feel like we accomplished something. And the rest of the new immigration law will sail through. Illegals will get amnesty.
78
posted on
05/16/2006 2:43:55 PM PDT
by
Revel
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Dear Mr. Derbez:
Nuts.
Sincerely,
The American People
79
posted on
05/16/2006 2:44:50 PM PDT
by
hispanarepublicana
(Don't fall for the soft bigotry of assuming all Hispanics are pro-amnesty. www.dontspeakforme.org)
To: Millee
Mexican border officials also said they worried that sending troops to heavily trafficked regions would push illegal migrants into more perilous areas of the U.S.-Mexican border to avoid detection. Sounds like human rights violations to me. /sarc
80
posted on
05/16/2006 2:44:50 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
("I wouldn't hurt you for the world, but you are standing where I am about to shoot." --Quaker quote)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 261-271 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson