Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve-b

"Nonsense. That's like saying that the only way police can be expected to tell the difference between law-abiding citizens and crooks is for the former to carry an official I Am Not A Crook card (with an engraved holographic seal depicting Richard Nixon, perhaps)."

If you can tell me how an employer can be expected to distinguish between an American citizen with a foreign accent and poor command of English, and some illegal alien who has perfect command of English and dresses and acts like an American, I'll agree with you.


360 posted on 05/16/2006 10:25:37 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]


To: ZULU
There is a basic concept in law called "due diligence" -- failure to learn a relevant fact is treated much more harshly if you chose to look the other way than if you failed to discover it after a good-faith effort.

The illegal alien problem, by and large, isn't driven by employers who were honestly fooled after a routine check of SSN, green-card records, and the like came back OK. It is driven by employers who simply don't bother, or who actively prefer to employ illegals (because they can be threatened with deportation if they complain about unsafe conditions, lousy pay, etc).

Exploiting the issue to sneak in the government's pre-existing your-papers-please agenda is unacceptable.

361 posted on 05/16/2006 10:33:45 AM PDT by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson