Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T; All

You say those not satisfied with Bush on immigration are expressing "Ingratitude"?

Ungrateful for McPain's unconstitutional "Campaign Finance Reform" that Bush swore he would veto, then didn't? You bet.

Ungrateful for never vetoing a single bill, in spite of the constant spending binge? You bet.

Ungrateful for the largest federal entitlement program increase in over forty years? You bet.

Ungrateful for the doubling of the federal expenditures and federal buraaucrats allocated for "education"? You bet.

Ungrateful for backtracking on the 2000 campaign pledge to reign in the bloated farm subsidies? You bet.

Ungrateful for a spiraling decline in every measure of enforcement actions against employers violating the immigration laws - massively lower than even the Clinton years? You bet.

Ungrateful for trying to foist an unknown into the judicial nominations with no more than a "trust me" to go on (Meiers)? You bet.

Ungrateful for a GOP majority U.S. Senate that is run on the agenda of the Democrats? You bet ten times over.

Ungrateful for refusing to end the fillibuster of judicial nominations? You bet.

Ungrateful for Bush sliming his own grass roots with the charge that "some" (he meant us) want a massive one-time deportation of the current 12 million illegally here now?
Definately we are ungrateful for that!

You're damn tootin we are ungrateful, because Bush and the GOP leadership have zero gratitude for the MAJORITY of people who put them in office.


2,747 posted on 05/15/2006 10:00:59 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1568 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

You need to be vaccinated.


2,751 posted on 05/15/2006 10:01:49 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2747 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli; All
  1. As for a demonstrable record of accomplishment domestically, there is nothing that remotely approaches the importance of, or the complexity of, (or the ingratitude for,) Bush's record on homeland defense-for-real.
  2. The clintons and the Left are playing the Right like a Spanish guitar.
  3. Do you really want the clintons to control the immigration issue? The War on Terror?


HILLARY CLINTON VOTES FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS BEFORE SHE VOTES AGAINST THEM
HEAR HER NOW


What's black and white and read all over and is more self-destructive than pre-9/11 thinking?


 

Fear is a powerful master and the only tool available to those who have no demonstrable record on which to stand. The fact that the Republicans must resort to fearmongering simply underscores their lack of accomplishment. I refuse to respond to the "The Evil Dem would be so much worse". Without demonstrable progress on domestic issues, Republicans will not get my vote. -- Conservative Goddess



And I will add this......We are NOT all knowing. Be very, very careful of trusting in a spirit of discernment that is based in fear, else you risk sitting in judgement of a friend, not enemy.--Kimberly GG


If being all-knowing was a prerequisite to action, we would all be in a state of permanent paralysis. Interestingly, this is bill clinton's favorite demagogic ploy :

'Through a glass darkly' is bill clinton's favorite biblical metaphor and his fixers' spin-of-last-resort.

When properly misconstrued, the phrase at once captures and effectuates the clinton con perfectly, placing clinton conveniently beyond the reach of criticism, impeachment (figuratively speaking), and, most important, punishment.

It is wrong to bear false witness because we all see through [the] glass darkly.--bill clinton

THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY:
HOW DECADES OF CLINTON DOUBLE-DEALING COMPROMISED OUR NATIONAL SECURITY
Mia T, March 8, 2006

I try to base my thinking on reasoned analysis of the facts, as best as I can discern them.

And fear is not necessarily a bad thing. It can be adaptive or it can be maladaptive. And as a matter of fact, it is usually adaptive. We depend on fear for our survival. It initiates our 'fight or flight' response. It is only 20th-century psychologizing that focused undue attention on the maladaptive variety.

Fear of the islamofascist terrorists (and by extension, fear of the return of the clintons to power) is adaptive; it is appropriate.

FIGHT? OR FLIGHT?

Will we return the clintons to power and flee? Or will we elect a Republican and continue to fight? (Fleeing is tantamount to surrendering: When terrorists declare war on you and commit acts of war against you, you are perforce at war. At that point you have only one decision to make: Do you fight or do you surrender? For eight years, the clintons repeatedly chose surrender.)

As for a demonstrable record of accomplishment domestically, there is nothing that remotely approaches the importance of, or the complexity of, (or the ingratitude for,) Bush's record on homeland defense-for-real. I cannot imagine what it must do to a person to have that kind of responsibility on one's shoulders 24/7 for almost five years, not being able to talk about the successes even as the seditious Left broadcasts every 'failure' real and imagined (and self-fulfilled--think 'Tet Offensive')....

I am not a booster for the professional pol of any stripe--in my opinion we must, with time, get rid of them all--but I am sickened by this ingratitude on the Right almost as much as I am by the sedition on the Left.

It is time for a reality check.




[T]hey're using the same divide and conquer techniques. They infiltrate our political parties and organizations. They plant disinformation bombs and sow the seeds of political discontent. They are masters in the use of propaganda and rabble rousing.

Recognize the enemy for what he is and do not allow them to use divisive issues to destroy our conservative movement. We are winning. We must not be sidetracked by an issue that will be solved in due time as we elect more conservative members to our government and continue replacing liberal activist judges with constitutionalists.

The goal is the same as it's always been. We must hold the line and advance our cause. Never willingly give ground to the liberal/socialists! Never retreat! Never surrender!

The Beast must be destroyed!--

The game has not changed, we face the same enemy, same challenges. The Beast never dies!
May 10, 2006 | Jim Robinson

Lopez: If you had to bet money today…do Republicans stop her?

Podhoretz: Yes—with this caveat. If the party fails to focus on the threat from Hillary and tears itself apart from within in pursuit of doctrinal purity, then those in pursuit of purity over practical politics will hand the country to Hillary in 2008.

Lopez: In the short term: If Republicans lose big in 2006, how will it reflect on 2008? Will it be a good kick-start to the GOP or just put Dems that much ahead?

Podhoretz: Here's a very good rule of thumb in politics: Losing begets losing.

Lopez: How can blogs stop Hillary? Could the left-wing blogosphere wind up a thorn in her side?

Podhoretz: Blogs can and should keep the pressure on Hillary to speak, speak, speak. She prefers to remain silent for the most part, because that way she can limit any damage her words might cause. I offer some very practical tips for bloggers in the book....

Lopez: What’s your most important piece of advice on stopping Hillary?

Podhoretz: Conservatives must avoid the siren song of schism, or all is lost.

Kathryn Jean Lopez interviews John Podhoretz
National Review Online
May 09, 2006, 6:13 a.m.


STOPPING HILLARY
[JOHN PODHORETZ'S CRITICALLY IMPORTANT MESSAGE (and it's not his 'HILLARY IS A BITCH' THEORY OF ELECTABILITY)]
Mia T, 5.12.06


2,872 posted on 05/15/2006 10:43:19 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2747 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli

Just for the record, I remembering Bush warning Congress that if they passed the hot potato to him on CFR not to count on him to veto it. He told them they had to vote responsibly and not expect him to veto it and take the heat.

So, you'll have to cite your source for claiming he said he would veto it, as I believe you have your facts wrong here.


2,940 posted on 05/15/2006 11:15:29 PM PDT by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2747 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson