Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shortstop7

True unfortunately. It's silly. I saw a post that someone said Bush was going to do amnesty because he said so in the speech, and he said TWO TIMES that amnesty was not acceptable and he wouldn't sign a bill that gave amnesty. All you have to do is quote the speach and it destroys all the people here who are ripping Bush for it. I've been all over Bush's case the past couple years for his total lack of effort to secure the border, but tonight I have to give him an "atta boy". He said the things real conservatives have been saying need to be done. I mean, like I've said a dozen times tonight. Tancredo is all over this speach and supports it totally. That says it all. So anyone here who is ripping Bush a new one, even though Tancredo, real conservative, co-founder of the Minutemen, supports the speach, well, those people here opposing the speach either didn't really listen to it, or are DU'ers coming here to create a false sense of dissention in the conservative ranks. I'm not biting. :)


2,237 posted on 05/15/2006 8:06:06 PM PDT by TexasPatriot8 (Vote Republican. A conservative America, for a better future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2102 | View Replies ]


To: TexasPatriot8
t's silly. I saw a post that someone said Bush was going to do amnesty because he said so in the speech, and he said TWO TIMES that amnesty was not acceptable and he wouldn't sign a bill that gave amnesty.

Bill Clinton didn't call his tax increase "wealth redistribution" either - he called it "investing in America".

2,257 posted on 05/15/2006 8:09:28 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson