Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

Honestly?

If the whole border is not fenced, those areas that are not currently traversed, because they are remote, will become the new entry points.


2,219 posted on 05/15/2006 8:03:03 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (La nuit tombe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2182 | View Replies ]


To: Vicomte13

Not to mention the miles of shoreline along the California & Texas borders.


2,236 posted on 05/15/2006 8:06:04 PM PDT by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2219 | View Replies ]

To: Vicomte13
Some areas of the frontier are difficult to reach by foot or vehicle. If they are inaccessible how would they represent a new entry point? And even if they are, couldn't those points be easily monitored and patrolled? I guess what I mean is what is the use of an enhanced BP if every mile of the border is fenced or walled?

I say this because Senator Sessions is introducing an amendment that would authorize construction of a fence but only for one traversing a small percentage of the border. Would you suggest that Sen. Sessions has gone soft on illegals?

2,308 posted on 05/15/2006 8:18:39 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson