Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vicomte13
I actually liked a good deal of what he said. Perhaps because I expected worse. It was just rather empty to come forward and do something now five years after 9/11. The good thing in this is that he laid out a plan and basically demanded that Congress follow it. Too bad he hasn't done this on a number of other issues but...

If Congress followed his plans word-for-word it would be a decent bill. Too bad he left out key components that would make it an actual "comprehensive" plan. Largely the "crack down on employers" component.

1,584 posted on 05/15/2006 6:21:37 PM PDT by TigersEye (Sedition and treason are getting to be a Beltway fashion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1497 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

There is hope. If there is guest worker program then employer accountability would have to be a part of this.


1,626 posted on 05/15/2006 6:26:27 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1584 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye
"I actually liked a good deal of what he said."........The good thing in this is that he laid out a plan and basically demanded that Congress follow it. Too bad he hasn't done this on a number of other issues but...If Congress followed his plans word-for-word it would be a decent bill. Too bad he left out key components that would make it an actual "comprehensive" plan. Largely the "crack down on employers" component.

There is nothing that Bush needs to "demand" from Congress and he has every law needed, now, to "crack down on employers" and every measure of that enforcement activity, which is his resonsibility and his alone, has been on a downward trend since he took office.

In a direct, defacto manner Bush has created the impulse towards amnesty by doing absoultely nothing for six years but fail to enforce the law, fail to defend the border and appease Vicente Fox. That is not a record on which one can find good intentions on the part of Bush on any immigration matter.

Unwillingness to absolutely enforce current law, together with unwillingness to recoup from that failure first will be seen, by millions overseas, as direct indication of lack of intent to enforce the law, reformed or otherwise, in the future.

The course set in the House - first do one thing right, establish the means to enforce the current law and control the border - then, in a couple years, if that is starting to work, go back to how much "compassion" we owe those already here illegally.

That sets the priorities in the right order, without executing any one-time massive deportation and sends the signal to future potential illegal immigrants that we are closing that option. When we know they are getting that signal, we can then address questions like higher legal immigration quotas and for what catgeories - not before; because lack of enforcement trumps all laws and all "reforms".

2,669 posted on 05/15/2006 9:36:59 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1584 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson