Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: old_sage_says
Slight correction. The Mayflower landed in 1620. Jamestown, the 1st permanent English settlement, was in 1607. I invite you to come to "the birthplace of America", the Old Dominion, the great state of Virginia and celebrate with us, our 400th birthday in 2007. Are you THAT dimwitted enough not to realize that Texas, California and the whole southwest were not part of Mexico at the time?
1,409 posted on 05/15/2006 6:03:58 PM PDT by bfree ("Smoke 'em if you got 'em")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1373 | View Replies ]


To: bfree

FYI. I am not a dimwit.

I only corrected your assertion about the Mayflower.

I know there were Spaniards were here and most likely the Danes were here before them.

You owe me an apology, boy.


1,442 posted on 05/15/2006 6:06:18 PM PDT by old_sage_says ("Man does not live by his words alone, despite the fact that he sometimes has to eat them" A S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1409 | View Replies ]

To: bfree; old_sage_says; All
bfree said, ""And the vast majority of Mexican Americans in this country qualify the same way. Many of the families were here before the Mayflower even launched.""

I asked what bfree was smoking and bfree told me to read a history book. I then asked, "So you are arguing that the "vast majority" of "Mexican Americans" in this nation have had ancestry in this nation since before the launch of the Mayflower? Is that what you are asserting?"

Old_sage_says said, "Slight correction. The Mayflower landed in 1620. Jamestown, the 1st permanent English settlement, was in 1607. I invite you to come to "the birthplace of America", the Old Dominion, the great state of Virginia and celebrate with us, our 400th birthday in 2007."

To which bfree replied, "Are you THAT dimwitted enough not to realize that Texas, California and the whole southwest were not part of Mexico at the time?"

Now I ask bfree what was the Mexican population of all SW border states under Mexico compared to an equal number of states from the original 13 colonies in the year 1800? If your assertion were true then it stands to reason that their populations should have been comparable. I'll trust your sources and look forward to your answer.
1,784 posted on 05/15/2006 6:47:20 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1409 | View Replies ]

To: bfree
Are you THAT dimwitted enough not to realize that Texas, California and the whole southwest were not part of Mexico at the time?

They were under the control of the Spanish. Mexico as a nation did not exist until 1810. NOT in the seventeenth century, but the nineteenth. Also, aside from the indigenous tribes of the area, there were few Mexican nationals, even during the Mexican-American war.

Now cease your name calling and settle down.

APf

2,006 posted on 05/15/2006 7:26:04 PM PDT by APFel (Loose ships sink lips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1409 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson