To: blam
Plundering of archeological sites by the smugglers has become a common issue in archeology. However, according to Ataee, archeologists believe that illegal diggers cannot be held responsible for destroying of this palace by bulldozers, and it was a deliberate act by an unknown person or group of people who intended to devastate this place for a reason that is not clear for archeologists.That's sad.
3 posted on
05/15/2006 2:57:10 PM PDT by
ahayes
(Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
To: ahayes
However, according to Ataee, archeologists believe that illegal diggers cannot be held responsible for destroying of this palace by bulldozers, and it was a deliberate act by an unknown person or group of people who intended to devastate this place for a reason that is not clear for archeologists. Remember the giant Buddhas? So much ancient history is lost thanks to some very intolerant people.
7 posted on
05/15/2006 3:00:19 PM PDT by
RikaStrom
(The number one rule of the Kama Sutra is that you both be on the same page.../Exeter 051705)
To: ahayes
...illegal diggers cannot be held responsible for destroying of this
palace by bulldozers, and it was a deliberate act by an unknown person
or group of people who intended to devastate this place for a
reason that is not clear for archeologists.
While I'm probably wrong...
If the investigators knocked on my door, I'd say "have you noticed how
how 'not built by Muslims' sometimes shortens the life of major
buildings and statues?".
8 posted on
05/15/2006 3:01:16 PM PDT by
VOA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson