Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pukin Dog
1. Interesting. For some reason, I have no fear of Rove being indicted, because I don't think he's guilty of anything, and also because I don't think he'd ever be FOUND guilty of anything.

2. You need to update your very interesting piece on your profile. We need more ammo against the trolls.

6 posted on 05/15/2006 9:43:40 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf377
Seems a little tooooo clever and Machiavellian by a few orders of magnitude for the Dims.

We've seen this past week it's possible to get a GJ indict people when someone else's DNA exonerates them.

Sure, Rove "can" be indicted, since he did in fact incorrectly testify to the GJ about the e-mails that the WH system didn't find. Or he could be indicted for deliberately and with malice of forethought keeping a messy garage in the District of Columbia. (Remember the TV crews last election?) This entire episode is as close to a witch hunt as I've ever seen. If he gets a legal defense fund, my check will be in the mail that day.

20 posted on 05/15/2006 9:52:44 AM PDT by Sooth2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson