[Durus]

Perhaps, you could expound upon JP Morgan, J. Paul Gettys, Vanderbilt, and a host of others called “robber barons.”
My reason for doing that would be what?

Is it your contention that all of those individuals and/or their organizations could not have, and did not, reach monopoly, or near monopoly status, except through the intervention/collusion of government?
That is very close to my contention.

While you’re at it, illustrate on the practical differences among cartels, trusts, and monopolies from the perspective of the small entrepreneur and consumer.
I don't think I will when anyone reading this can find that information for themselves. If you have something to say then go ahead and say it.

Given that the government currently regulates US markets to supposedly prevent the formation of monopolies, how many monopolies have been formed as a result?
If you think that asking a myriad of questions is a basis for debate or discussion then I won't waste my time posting. My original statement stands and you've offered nothing to make me reconsider my position.

[Lucky Dog]

Perhaps, you could expound upon JP Morgan, J. Paul Gettys, Vanderbilt, and a host of others called “robber barons.”

My reason for doing that would be what?

In a debate, it is customary to offer a defense and explanation of your assertions. Your assertion was challenged politely with a question citing some examples that some would say counter your point. That, in a nutshell, is the reason for answering the question.

While you’re at it, illustrate on the practical differences among cartels, trusts, and monopolies from the perspective of the small entrepreneur and consumer.

I don't think I will when anyone reading this can find that information for themselves. If you have something to say then go ahead and say it.

Very well, I contend that your assertion is erroneous. As you provided no support for your assertion when you made it, it known as a “gratuitous assertion” and it is logically defeated by my “gratuitous denial.” By posing the question to you, I was inviting you to produce your evidence and reasoning, if you have any.

If you think that asking a myriad of questions is a basis for debate or discussion then I won't waste my time posting. My original statement stands and you've offered nothing to make me reconsider my position.

Such a statement indicates a lack of willingness to even consider changing one’s position. Very well, I accept that you won’t “waste your time posting.” Good day, sir.