Conservatives sitting out 2006 hurts the GOP’s right, not the RINOs

National Review ^ | 05/15/06 08:39 AM | Jim Geraghty

[isaiah55version11_0]

I doubted the strategic wisdom of conservatives sitting out this election to “teach Republicans a lesson”; several bloggers have responded.

There are still doubters and skeptics, though. What’s really stunning is this absolute certainty of angry conservatives that A) Republicans will learn the right lessons from the defeat, and not, say, respond in a panic by embracing their inner RINO and flailing around for MSM approval and B) that the Republicans can easily win back Congress in 2008, just by stiffening their spines and pledging to return to their conservative roots.

I have my doubts on both counts. For starters, why would Republicans get the message that “we need to be more conservative” in a year that conservatives were knocked out?

Who are the Republican lawmakers most angering the conservative base? Well, let’s say Sens. Trent “I’m tired of hearing about Porkbusters” Lott, Ted “Bridge to Nowhere” Stevens, John McCain for cosponsoring Kennedy’s immigration bill and campaign finance reform, Arlen Specter for being a pain in the tushie over judges, Chuck Hagel for being the New York Times’ favorite Republican senator to criticize Bush, and other minimally-conservative Republicans like Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins. Well, they’re not going to lose in 2006. Most of ‘em aren’t even up for reelection this year.

Look at the Republicans most in jeopardy in 2006. (I’m using National Journal’s most recent rankings.)

In the Senate, a bad year for the Republicans would mean the loss of Rick Santorum (who has lifetime American Conservative Union rating of 88 out of a possible 100, and a 92 in 2005) in Pennsylvania, Jim Talent (93 rating lifetime, and a 96 in 2005) in Missouri, Conrad Burns (91, and a perfect 100 in 2005) in Montana and Mike DeWine (80 lifetime, only 56 in 2005) in Ohio. Of course, Ohio voters who sit this one out will replace DeWine with Sherrod Brown, who has a lifetime rating of 8 and 4 for 2005. And they won’t get to revisit that decision until 2012.

If the GOP base doesn’t show up in Minnesota, you get Amy Klobuchar instead of Mark Kennedy (90 rating lifetime, 84 in 2005).

If the GOP base doesn’t show in Maryland, you get Ben Cardin (lifetime rating of 6, 2005 rating of 0!) or Kweise Mfume (lifetime ACU rating of 4) instead of Michael Steele.

If the GOP base doesn’t show in Tennessee, you get Harold Ford (19 lifetime, 21 in 2005) instead of Ed Bryant (lifetime ACU score of 98!) Van Hilleary (lifetime score of 97!). Another GOP candidate is Bob Corker, Chattanooga mayor.

If the GOP base doesn't show in West Virginia, you get Robert Byrd (lifetime rating of 30, 20 in 2005) as Appropriations Committee Chairman, instead of businessman John Raese.

If the GOP base doesn't show in Washington, you keep Maria Cantwell (11 lifetime, 8 in 2005) instead of businessman Mike McGavick.

Okay, maybe Chafee goes down. But you've lost how many solid conservatives to remove this one guy?

In the House, I'm looking at the vulnerable incumbent Republicans, according to the Hotline.

There’s Bob Ney, who has a lifetime ACU rating of 86, and 88 in 2005. I realize he has ethics issues; the voters in his district will have to decide whether the allegations are serious enough to disqualify him from office. (Presuming a prosecutor doesn't say something first.)

There’s Jim Gerlach of Pennsylvania, with a 67 lifetime and 56 in 2005. Let’s observe that Kerry carried Gerlach’s district, and Al Gore did as well four years earlier; each of the last two cycles Gerlach has carried 51 percent of the vote. So Gerlach may be as conservative a lawmaker as you can elect in this district.

Down the line of the National Journal list, you see fairly conservative to very conservative GOP lawmakers at risk this year: Shaw of Florida, 82 lifetime, 71 last year. Heather Wilson of New Mexico 82 lifetime, 75 last year. Mike Sodrel of Indiana, 92, only served one year so far. Davis, Kentucky 88, another first-year guy. Hostettler of Indiana, 90 lifetime, 100 in 2005. Pryce of Ohio, 79 lifetime, 83 in 2005. Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania, (Mr. Able Danger!) 70 lifetime, 65 in 2005. Charles Taylor of North Carolina, 92 both lifetime and 2005.

Yeah, maybe if conservatives stay home, they’ll knock out liberal Republican Chris Shays of Connecticut. Whoop-de-doo. Who’s going to be left standing?

Trent “I’m tired of hearing about Porkbusters” Lott, Ted “Bridge to Nowhere” Stevens, John McCain, Arlen Specter, Chuck Hagel, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins.

Nice job, guys. Your effort to re-conservativize the Republican Party in Washington by staying home this year will have the effect of massacring the actual conservatives and empowering the moderates who you disdain. Perhaps we can call this counterproductive maneuver “RINO-plasty.”

But that’s okay, the staying-at-home-conservatives insist. The GOP will win back the House and Senate in 2008, establishing a true conservative majority.

Maybe. But as I mentioned, what kind of lengths do you think the Democrats will go to in order to keep power once they’ve got it? Does the “Fairness Doctrine” ring a bell? You think Pelosi and Reid wouldn’t try that tactic to hinder conservative talk radio? How about McCain-Feingold 2.0, with a particular focus on controlling “unregulated speech” on the Internet and blogs?

Think the MSM was cheerleading for Democrats in 2004? How much more fair and balanced do you think they’ll be when their task is to defend Democratic House and Senate majorities AND elect President Hillary Rodham Clinton? My guess is, they’ll make the CBS memo story look accurate and evenhanded by comparison.

Think the GOP can prevail in close races once they’re out of power? Ask the members of the military who had their ballots in Florida blocked. Ask Doug Forrester how well his anti-Torricelli campaign worked when he suddenly faced Frank Lautenberg at the last minute. Ask Dino Rossi. Ask Democrat Tim Johnson if he’s glad the last county in South Dakota to report its results just happened to have enough of a Democratic margin to put him over the top in 2002.

Once the Democrats regain control of Congress, a GOP takeover is going to be exponentially harder than it was in 1994. You’re never going to catch the Democrats as flatfooted again.

Why are so many conservatives hell-bent on cutting off their nose to spite their face? Are they really willing to throw away a decade’s worth of work and go back to square one?

We usually like looking at the Daily Kos crowd insisting for an immediate pullout of the troops or impeachment hearings right this second and we laugh at them for their ludicrously unrealistic expectations.

But apparently the Kos are not the only ones with an all-or-nothing mentality. Sometimes in life you have to use the West Coast offense, nickel and diming your way down the field instead of going for the long bomb. If I want a more conservative government, I get it by electing the more conservative of the two choices, even if he isn’t as conservative as I would like. I do not get it by sitting on the sidelines and pouting, and letting the less conservative guy take the reigns of power.

For this I get labeled a “bamboobzled [sic] boob” by the likes of Bill Quick. Yeah, I’m the unreasonable one.

[peyton randolph]

No voice of SANITY can expect to receive any response but howling absurdities from the "base". Once the baying-at-the-moon pack starts to run it is hard to stop.

---

What a shame. If we had just stopped baying, Harriet Miers would be on the Supreme Court. /s

[angkor]

GWB could go a very long way toward solving this problem with one sentence during this evening's speech: "I will veto any immigration bill that includes an amnesty, or exceeds the proposal I offered in January 2004. As I said then, amnesties are unfair and mock the rule of law."

Of course there's still the spending issue.

[rhombus]

Once the baying-at-the-moon pack starts to run it is hard to stop.

Agreed,they will thump their chests at Republican defeat and then whine and moan and look for conspiracies when liberals refuse to listen to them.

[HuntsvilleTxVeteran]

Compromise has caused America to be nearly socialist now the compromise that will allow CRIMINALS who overstay their visas and INVADERS to be rewarded will destroy America.
The vote for the party because they are the less of the evil is just another nail in our coffin!

[Jotmo]

This is what sickens me the most.

I will vote for them like a drone, just as I have the last 20 years.

The Democrats are communist, islamic fascist appeasing traitors, and cannot be given the majority again.

So I will vote, and I will be ignored and betrayed, and I will get angry. But what other choice do I have.

The Democrats will betray and sell out our entire country. The Republicans will only betray and sell out conservatives.

[Havoc]

failing again to grasp reality or deal with third party option as a valid move. They just don't want to imagine that the public would cut both parties loose and start over.

[rhombus]

GWB could go a very long way toward solving this problem with one sentence during this evening's speech: "I will veto any immigration bill that includes an amnesty, or exceeds the proposal I offered in January 2004. As I said then, amnesties are unfair and mock the rule of law." Of course there's still the spending issue.

So in other words, we will not be appeased. :-)

[Kewz1]

This reminds me of something my mother used to tell me. Oh yeah. "Don't cut your nose off to spite your face."

I'll be voting Republican.

And just for the record -- I still support the President.

[justshutupandtakeit]

There has been on "ignoring" unless you mean those insisting on raising taxes; cutting and running in the War on Terror; endorsing homo marriage; appointing Liberals to the Courts and other such idiocies.

As far as the LocoFocos and Know Nothings about Illegals go, who can reason with those who watch the Party of Treason organize, sponsor, provide speakers for massive demonstrations THEN want to attack the GOP thereby giving MORE power to the forces who want MORE Illegals? If this is not insanity then the word has lost its meaning.

[justshutupandtakeit]

Sayeth the Voice of Fools.

[G.Mason]

Compromise is a word made famous by lawyers.

I once overheard a lawyer and a client having an exchange of words.

The lawyer asked his client ... "What is it that you want?" The client said .. "Justice."

The lawyer said ... "You won't get justice in the courts. If you want justice, get a gun."

[Darkwolf377]

Please read the whole thing before you start flaming.

Well, you tried.

I've asked for but have yet to read ONE post from a Spite My Face Conservative that intelligently, coherently explained how their sitting out this November will:

A. Help their anti-illegal immigration cause

B. Make sure that "the message" gets through (has any "message" vote EVER changed the party as the messengers intended?) and changes are made accordingly, and

C. Guarantee that the Republicans of their choosing suddenly take back the Congress in 08 while keeping Hillary out of power

[justshutupandtakeit]

The Tail loves to try and way the Dog.

[Tracy V.]

I concur. Your Mom was right. Republican, block by block, the more conservative the better.

[B Knotts]

These kinds of articles always make me shake my head.

Most voters, conservative or otherwise, don't read political commentary pieces.

You can't influence voters by writing a column that says "you better turn out and vote."

What you can do, though, is write a column to the political insiders that actually read these pieces that convinces them to change their behavior, so as to encourage voters to turn out.

Like, for instance, actually doing things that conservative voters want.

[taxed2death]

Another writer who is putting the cart before the horse.

Every action has a reaction.
GWB abandons base, base decide not to show up on election day.

What is the cause of this?

Where does the "blame" if any...belong?

[kellynla]

The Gelding Old Party needs start acting like conservatives...
and with Bush's approval rating at 29;

I'd suggest they start today!

And someone needs to tell Bush that WE CAN DEPORT 11 MILLION ILLEGALS before he makes his speech tonight.

[Pessimist]

"For starters, why would Republicans get the message that “we need to be more conservative” in a year that conservatives were knocked out?"

This article is nothing more than more RINO political hackery.

As if these politicians don't listen to the polls, etc... ?

They'll know why they were ousted. And potential contenders will know which way to lean to pander to the right for a change.