I have noticed that as liberalism's grasp on the population weakens the "shrill" level increases. On television they are forced to gin up stories in order to mount an attack (false but accurate though they may be! - he he)
Stated, yes - but not really proven. That proof would require much more analysis of socialism ("liberalism") than the writer attempts.But he is correct: the fact that "liberalism" cannot be effectively promoted in Rush Limbaugh's "long form" format is in fact a demonstration of the fatuous nature of its basis.