Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doc30

"Science deals with the material universe and is hence, materialistic. Science is not equipped to deal with questions of morality'

Then the science types had better shut up about morality then! I get tired of the science types who decry the the moral history of given religions, the wars...ect. blah blah blah! For a science type to decry a belief as "superstition" is actually a moral judgment and not a scientific statement.


22 posted on 05/15/2006 7:31:54 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (Proof against evolution:"Man is the only creature that blushes, or needs to" M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: mdmathis6
Then the science types had better shut up about morality then! I get tired of the science types who decry the the moral history of given religions, the wars...ect. blah blah blah! For a science type to decry a belief as "superstition" is actually a moral judgment and not a scientific statement.

Well, scientists are entitled to their political opinions, must like anyone else. However, what you describe, moral history of religions, wars, etc., falls outside science as you pointed out. unless such opinions are based upon the impact of scientific and technological issues of the time. However, scientists are right to point out when something advocated as science by the lay public isn't science.

35 posted on 05/15/2006 9:02:04 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson