To: mthom
He is now supporting a path to citizenship for illegals. Something that for the last two years he told us was the wrong thing to do. OH baloney he has proposed that from the beginning. I'll bet you "voted for him twice" too. If you did you sure as hell didn't listen to the man.
56 posted on
05/14/2006 6:56:25 PM PDT by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: Texasforever
You are uninformed. Bush has not supported a path to citizenship for illegals until his speech in Irvine a few weeks ago. He supported guest worker status only. If youre going to mouth off on a subject then do a little research.
61 posted on
05/14/2006 6:59:24 PM PDT by
mthom
To: Texasforever; mthom
OH baloney he has proposed that from the beginning. I'll bet you "voted for him twice" too. If you did you sure as hell didn't listen to the man. I don't see no steenkin amnesty proposed here:
When campaigning for President in 1999, George W. Bush issued this statement:
[Federal expenditures would be more effective] "...at the front end, to stop people from illegally entering our country, not at the back end, by reimbursing states after it has failed to enforce the border." [I] "would allocate additional resources to enforcing the border, so states such as Texas and California would not have the huge expenses they currently do." (San Francisco Chronicle, Sept. 9, 1999)
62 posted on
05/14/2006 6:59:27 PM PDT by
nicmarlo
(Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
To: Texasforever
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson