Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lewislynn
Hence the 23% first year only teaser rate.

Yes, and only one of several reasons the advertised rate is too low:

- unacknowledged increases in state and local taxes to pay FairTax
- entitlement autopilot increases
- government-taxes-itself shell game
- no accounting for evasion or avoidance
- predicted but unacknowledged decline in total personal consumption
- ...
... to name a few others.
88 posted on 05/15/2006 8:38:12 AM PDT by Dimples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Dimples

Erroneous right down your list Dimp-Dimp.

You SQLers think up the most ignorant observations of "why" the FairTax rate is too low.

In fact, the actual revenue neutral rate right now would be about 19% rather than 23 - despite all your nonsensical observations.


90 posted on 05/15/2006 8:42:56 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Dimples

Well, let's add a few on the plus column, then:

Lower interest on public debt (Fed savings $120B/yr, State & Local $80B/yr)

State & Local taxes lowered by adoption of FairTax and tapping underground economy

Increase in purchasing power for educational expenses

Avoidance and evasion limited to 15% of total retail sales purchased outside of large retailers

Huge increase in personal consumption as individuals see larger paychecks and lower interest rates

Expansion of economy by 10% brings in additional $230B/yr


102 posted on 05/15/2006 10:28:10 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. --Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson