Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pigdog; Dimples
States and localities pay the FairTax (which is more likely a 19% t-i rate
Even if 19% vs 23% was true which it "more likely" isn't, is a new (HIDDEN) 19% tax on states and localities (That would be us, but you're too dishonest to admit that) supposed to make us all stand and cheer for the Fairtax?...we're not all lunatics too.
274 posted on 05/17/2006 7:47:22 AM PDT by lewislynn (Fairtax = lies, hope, wishful thinking, conjecture and lack of logic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: lewislynn

The states are taxed now Looey and the subset (you do know what that means, don't you?) of W&S employees affected is actually pretty small IAE.

There's nothing hidden about such a tax nor is it hidden by being embedded in prices as at present.


277 posted on 05/17/2006 8:38:35 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn
Even if 19% vs 23% was true which it "more likely" isn't, is a new (HIDDEN) 19% tax on states and localities...

What indicates that 19% isn't true?

Further, the tax is replacing taxes that already exist in nearly the same amounts. So the amount of tax remains nearly constant. In that sense, it's not new. It is only "new" in the sense that the bill would have passed more recently than the tax it replaces.

Honesty is the best policy lewis. That goes for paying your share of the income/payroll tax burden too.

284 posted on 05/17/2006 6:33:44 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson