Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kellis91789
And be sure the SS/M tax is completely eliminated as well, and I'm on board.

Let's see. You could support the Flat Tax IF the SS/MC tax was completely eliminated; yet you now support the FairTax which has the SS/MC tax embeded (buried, hidden) in the rate?

Help me understand your logic?

211 posted on 05/16/2006 12:32:32 PM PDT by Dimples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: Dimples

As I said, you're no doubt beyond help, but the SSMC rates are hardly embedded/buried since they're clearly delineated in the bill.

In the one case, your taxes are taken regardless of your desires, in the other it is your choice to pay them.

Since you seem unble to distinguish, the FairTax is this latter one.


216 posted on 05/16/2006 12:51:59 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: Dimples

Of course. The Flat Tax being high enough to cover the cost of SS/M without a separate tax is exactly the same as the way the FairTax does it. What is difficult to understand ?

Did you think I said "eliminate the SS/M program" ? No, just the separate tax. Although eliminating the program would be fine with me as well, but that is a different discussion.

Eliminating the SS/M spending boondoggle would let the FairTax rate be 15%, and I'll save for my own retirement.


221 posted on 05/16/2006 1:38:14 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. --Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson