Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xcamel

Oh, you and I can see the compliance cost as a burden on the economy as a whole. But that isn't what you said.

You said Congress wouldn't make up a bunch of new rules because it would cut into their budget by causing collection to cost too much. The mess we have now is only 'costing' $12B of their budget as far as Congress and 95% of Americans are concerned. If $12B will cover the costs to collect in this convoluted mess, that doesn't seem to be much of a deterrent to additional convoluted rules.

I can just hear Congress debating adding a bunch of new rules to a clean-slate Flat Tax: "Sure we can clarify things a bit here and there. The whole 55,000 pages of clarifications in the old system didn't cost much to implement, these few changes won't cost hardly anything at all !"


200 posted on 05/16/2006 9:35:44 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. --Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: Kellis91789

Same bad news for the Fair Tax., and I love a cynic - or at least one with an open mind....


202 posted on 05/16/2006 10:02:51 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson