Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kellis91789
You are making my arguement for me. It is precisely because not every decision is purely analytical that prices will not behave in the manner you insist. For your scenario to come to pass, EVERYONE must have perfect trust, perfect foresight, perfect capital mobility and perfect fairness (and that's what the simulations expect, by the way.)

If ANYONE deviates by maximizing their own situation under a new, untested tax regime, then BY DEFINITION, prices MUST rise higher than the levels that you claim.

It is not me living in the stange world ... I EXPECT people to behave outside the parameters of the plan.

135 posted on 05/15/2006 1:35:29 PM PDT by Dimples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: Dimples

[For your scenario to come to pass, EVERYONE must have perfect trust, perfect foresight, perfect capital mobility and perfect fairness (and that's what the simulations expect, by the way.) ]

Nonsense. I don't rely on vendors to have trust or foresight. I rely on their desperation to hold market when faced with consumers that punish them for not underbidding their competitors.

It's a dynamic process that happens automatically every day in a free market. It is not something that relies on central planning, foresight, agreement, or trust.


150 posted on 05/15/2006 3:07:16 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. --Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson