Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brazil's Lula da Silva: Rich Countries Produce Misery for the Poor
Paraná-Online ^ | May 13,2006 | Paraná-Online

Posted on 05/13/2006 6:58:30 AM PDT by Westbrook

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Translated as best as I could in a short time.

You will need to subscribe to Paraná-Online and be able to read Portuguese to read the original article.

My dois centavos (R$.02):

I guess the "rich" nations' contributions to medicine and technology don't count.

And where do they think all that famine relief comes from anyway? It comes from our "subsidized" agriculture.

Not to mention, that there are more than a few Latin Americans here in the States making way better money with way better living conditions than those in the socialist paradises in South and Central America.

1 posted on 05/13/2006 6:58:32 AM PDT by Westbrook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
Handouts create dependency. Dependency makes poverty worse. Probably some truth to that.

Simple answer -- no more foreign aid!
2 posted on 05/13/2006 7:00:26 AM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
Pure socialism.

It's getting so you can label any "news" coming out of certain coutries that way, without even reading the articles.

3 posted on 05/13/2006 7:01:15 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Can't wait for Dems to win in November and finally close that border!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Lula is lulu.


4 posted on 05/13/2006 7:01:46 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (We want our day: A day without hearing SPANISH ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Well I know that the leftist rant that there is terrorism because wealthy westerners are exploiting the poor is BS.

Bin Laden is a Billionaire. Arafat was a Billionaire. Saddam spent a BILLION dollars on a mosque in the shape of his thumbprint so "Allah" could see it/him.

The money is out there. Despots use it for evil.


5 posted on 05/13/2006 7:04:26 AM PDT by weegee (Slowly but surely and deliberately, converativism is being made a thoughtcrime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
Brazil's Lula da Silva: Rich Countries Produce Misery for the Poor

And socialists put the poor out of their misery.

6 posted on 05/13/2006 7:06:40 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

He raises the victim mentality to a whole new level.


7 posted on 05/13/2006 7:12:27 AM PDT by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Ironically, Lula has governed fairly pro-capitalist, compared to other LatAm politicians. This is more populist rhetoric to help him in the polls, as he faces re-election this year: Brazilian farmers are facing tough times because the large appreciation in the Brazilian Real is eating into their incomes.


8 posted on 05/13/2006 7:17:45 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo ("Give a man a fish, make him a Democrat. Teach a man to fish, make him a Republican.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
Lula inquired, "How long will we tolerate this perverse situation?"

Until we tell you to hop on one leg and bark like a dog.

9 posted on 05/13/2006 7:21:45 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
Ok, I am for subsidies to US farmers so that we will not find ourselves in the position of Britain in the two World Wars. If we don't have our own farming, we become dependent on others for food.

Incident to that, US taxpayers do not penalize consumers in poor countries. Rather our abundant supplies drive down prices around the world so that food costs less--contrary to what Lula states.

Add to that the med and scientific benefits that derive from an economy built on an abundant ag base and you realize that Lula really does not understand economics worth a damn.

As pink and red Latin America (Mexico, Cuba, Brazil, Venezuela, Bolivia, Peru, Chile, Uruguay and Argentina) collapse economically, our southern borders are going to come under tremendous pressure.

McVey
10 posted on 05/13/2006 7:25:30 AM PDT by mcvey (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

It may be populist rhetoric, but it still will influence how his citizens think.

I know Lula has moved in a pro-market direction and I understand politics very well. The fact that Lula finds this type of rhetoric useful indicates the victimization-think that his listeners are prepared to recieve.


11 posted on 05/13/2006 7:28:41 AM PDT by mcvey (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Yeah, that's the way it works. You have a tiny productive anomaly that accomplishes everything while the rest live off their scraps and whine about it.


12 posted on 05/13/2006 7:34:54 AM PDT by D.P.Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
Lula inquired, "How long will we tolerate this perverse situation?"

As long as we say you will, punk.

-ccm

13 posted on 05/13/2006 7:48:13 AM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
Our subsidized agriculture IS a problem, but not for the reasons he lists. It's a subsidy war with Europe. And since we are 'giving it away' anyway via food aid, why subsidize it too? Let the market determine the actual production costs of ag products.
Contrary to what the Brazilian president says, we do NOT have inefficient farmers in America, they are highly efficient and able to produce much more than the market demands. This is a partial reason for subsidies, paying farmers NOT to grow.

Even in an unsubsidized market place, Brazil would never be able to compete against our highly mechanized production methods.

And there lies the reason for Europe's high subsidies, they can't compete either.

There is no easy cure for Brazil's poor agricultural sector, except one- stop socialized farming, it doesn't work. 15 million dead Ukrainians in the early 30's, the result of Stalin's forced collective farming are proof of that.

Any serious effort to stop farm subsidies begins with Europe, where small, inefficient farmers are the most heavily subsidized in the world. The resulting collapse, and amalgamation of these small farms into larger, self sustaining commercial farms is something Europeon leaders have resisted for decades, over fears of political backlash.

This has placed Europe as many decades behind in the ag sector, making the inevitable transformation all the more painful. Revolts will plague Europe, which is why they will continue to provide farm welfare for years to come.

14 posted on 05/13/2006 7:51:00 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcvey
Not quite correct. I won't rebut point by point, but let's pick a single example of how US policy affects Brazil. Brazil has the natural advantage of climate in the production of sugarcane. Such is the advantage that they produce at one third the price of US producers. Political pressure (and campaign payoffs) by Big Sugar has kept tariffs on foreign sugar, which drives up the price to US consumers who pay much more than the world price. Farmers in Brazil have lost a market, and US consumers got screwed, too. Low cost sugar has another benefit as being a cost competitive feed stock for ethanol production (for auto fuel or other uses). Please note a common thread with respect to ethanol production - US subsidies support the American industry to the detriment of US consumers. Iowa caucuses come early in the election cycle for a specific reason - no potential presidential candidate can make it through to election unless the corn farmers are placated.
15 posted on 05/13/2006 7:58:22 AM PDT by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mcvey
Why do you want to stop with subsidies for the farmers?

Why not for the automakers too since foreign cars eat their lunch?

Electronics is another.

In fact, how about subsidizing my business?
16 posted on 05/13/2006 8:04:48 AM PDT by Misplaced Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
See your 2 centavos and raise you 2 more:

Lula is a Socialist a**hole who because he is part of the elite governing class criticizes everyone else. Brazil is nor a poor country. They have a wealth of natural resources, good ports and harbors, and rich farmland, and significant foreign and domestic investment.

What unfortunately they also have in abundance is an oppressive, corrupt, socialist mentality that ensures that generation after generation, the poor are kept down in the "favellas" where their life is short, violent,disease ridden, and thoroughly Hobbsian in nature.

They will have yet another revlution before is' all over.

17 posted on 05/13/2006 8:08:03 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

Plus they have their niche markets in agriculture as well, coffee for example, banana's and nuts.(plus the political kind you mentiond)


18 posted on 05/13/2006 8:16:56 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
The Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva accused the European Union, the United States, and other developed economies of "corrupting" inefficient farmers by granting of subsidies and, with this, producing "poverty" in the developing world.

Actually, that seems pretty accurate, along the lines of the food "aid" we send third-world countries which ends up destroying their farmers' chances of making a profit.
19 posted on 05/13/2006 8:21:39 AM PDT by Shion (Jaded Southern Californian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine


Spent almost seven weeks in Brazil last Autumn, almost all of it in the southern state of Paraná.

Folks there tell me that there are "Two Brasils", the poor agricultural Brazil of the North, and the more middle-class techno-industrial Brazil of the South.

I don't think that there's a revolution in the works, as the government is relatively lenient and tolerates all kinds of rhetoric from across the political spectrum. With plenty of venting opportunities, the pressures that foment revolutions don't tend to build-up enough.

There is a lot of corruption in their government, but there's a lot in ours, too. Perhaps not as much, because we're more proactive about it.

The biggest problem in Brazil is crime. Where we were, it was mostly breaking into stores at night. There are a lot of security agencies with vigilante mindsets, so you have to be pretty desperate to be willing to risk something like that.

By the way, the Ethanol pumps, while present at every gas station, appeared to be frequented only by delivery vans and panel trucks. I don't recall ever seeing a car at an ethanol pump. Our rented car was gasoline, and I don't think that they had any ethanol cars in the fleet where we rented our car. Gas was about R$2.50/liter, which translated roughly to US$4.00 per gallon, at the time. Ethanol was a bit less, about US$3.50 per gallon. All the tractor-trailers we saw were regular diesel.

.


20 posted on 05/13/2006 8:22:51 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson