Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/13/2006 6:26:21 AM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: radar101

ONE ATHIEST wants it gone.
76% of San Diego voted to keep it.


2 posted on 05/13/2006 6:27:51 AM PDT by radar101 (The two hallmarks of Liberals: Fantasy and Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
"This is a 40-foot, 20-ton symbol of the Christian religion ..."

Huh, the "Christian religion"?!?!?

What's that and where's the nearest "Christian church"? And what are its rites, tenets and how does one join this "Christian religion"?

4 posted on 05/13/2006 6:35:00 AM PDT by Condor51 (Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
Someday these rat bastards will go after the religous symbols (Cross, Star of David, etc) engraved on tax payer provided headstones provided for our fallen (and veterans?).

Just wait.

It's time to push back and push back hard.

6 posted on 05/13/2006 6:40:03 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Liberals saying "We Support The Troops" is like OJ looking for the real killers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Accusing the Mayor of misinformation when he makes the biggest blunder of all does indicate where he is coming from. "Christian religion" indeed...


7 posted on 05/13/2006 6:41:54 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
"This is not a true statement. There is not one single federal or California case that has ever approved the permanent placement of a cross on federal land, state land or city land, monument or no monument, war memorial or no war memorial."

Aren't their a large number of crosses in Arlington National Cemetery? Isn't Arlington National Cemetery a war memorial on federal land?
8 posted on 05/13/2006 6:47:31 AM PDT by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
The Congress needs to act fast to take these cases away from the Judiciary. Otherwise these Socialist scum lawyers from the ACLU will continue to shop them to their fellow traveler tyrants in black robes.
9 posted on 05/13/2006 7:10:02 AM PDT by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

It's been rather obvious from the start that this case has nothing to do with the so called "separation of church and state" and everything to do with removing the cross.


10 posted on 05/13/2006 7:13:16 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
There is not one single federal or California case that has ever approved the permanent placement of a cross on federal land, state land or city land, monument or no monument, war memorial or no war memorial.

I believe there was a court case about a cross on some federal land in Oklahoma several (10+) years ago. At least I think it is on federal land. Anyway, the cross is still there. I'm trying to remember the specifics of the case. I do know the anti-cross folks lost the case though.

13 posted on 05/13/2006 7:51:54 AM PDT by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
Why is he following the marching orders of 190,000 voters and ignoring the marching orders of 250,000 voters?

No, the real question is why is does the city have to bow down to one religiously intolerant bigoted @sshole like Phil Paulson and ignoring the 190,000 people that want to keep the cross?

17 posted on 05/13/2006 10:39:34 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
WWGWD?

What would George Washington do? It beggars belief to think that writers of the Constitution would ban this cross. Those who say it does aren't expressing a real opinion on the Constitution, they are consciously lying. It is an example of the complete control that liberalism has over debate in the society, and the complete servility of their "conservative" "opponents" that this argument is treated seriously at all.

18 posted on 05/13/2006 11:00:09 AM PDT by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson