Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cardinal4
The official cause, I thought, was wingtip vortices from a departing JAL 747-400. I was unaware that anything had been settled..

Well, the plane did hit the 747's vorticies...twice. The first time the plane enountered them, the pilot made almost no inputs to the controls and the jet flew through it.. No big deal.

The second time, however, the pilot inexplicably stomped on the rudder peddles way beyond what was required. He did either three or four “hardovers” where one rudder peddle was pushed all the way to the right, then the left, causing the plane to yaw. Each hardover made the plane yaw even more—like a pendulum—eventually overloading the vertical stab and snapping it off.

That you could snap off a tail with rudder inputs raised a lot of eyebrows, but I believe it was in the Airbus manual.

9 posted on 05/12/2006 7:32:23 PM PDT by Knuckledragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Knuckledragger
That you could snap off a tail with rudder inputs raised a lot of eyebrows, but I believe it was in the Airbus manual.

Wasnt a composite material initially blamed? Now you know why they always say, "Caution wake turbulence form departing 747" with instructions to position and hold or cleared for takeoff..

10 posted on 05/12/2006 7:37:22 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Kerry-Mcarthy in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Knuckledragger
That you could snap off a tail with rudder inputs raised a lot of eyebrows, but I believe it was in the Airbus manual.

Doesn't the computer override such violent inputs by the pilot?

16 posted on 05/12/2006 7:50:00 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson