[HitmanLV]

What did I say that was factually wrong? You can use quote marks around the word "information" as much as you want, but it doesn't help your case and it doesn't make any of those facts any less true.

The thing is, you asked me for specifics, and when I gave you specifics you just dismiss them. Astounding.

Denial isn't a river in Egypt.

Harry Reid is up for election in four years, I will concern myself about it then. As for my interest, with the GOP doing poorly, every Senate race is every Republican's business. With a real danger of losing the House and/or the Senate, every race is my business. I want to see the GOP win, not satisfy some strange misplaced fixation of the "Katherine Harris or Bust" crew.

[Joe Brower]

"What did I say that was factually wrong?"

Most of what you stated was from the attack-playbook of the DNC propaganda machine, aka, the NYT and its subsidaries. Your hook, line and sinker acceptance of their pejoratives and focus is a dead giveaway.

Methinks you've bought the BS without even realizing it. Easy enough to do when all you are hearing is the Big Lie repeated over and over again. From your far-off location in Nevada, it's not surprising that's all you've heard. Being here in the Florida trenches, the view here is with our own eyes. Big difference, that.

So much for your "specifics". They are what I expected. That is why I dismiss them.

If you want to see the GOP win, then stop attacking the only viable candidate their going to have. Deeds, not words.

[NCWarrior]

I want to see the GOP win, not satisfy some strange misplaced fixation of the "Katherine Harris or Bust" crew.

Shouldn't that be 'and'?