[WideGlide]

What is it about the 4th Amendment protection from "unreasonable search" language that people don't understand? Unreasonable does not mean "ANY." We're not insulated from any and/or all searches, some are reasonable. Apparently it's okay for a robot to take your picture on your way home from your girlfriend's house if you happen to run a red light. On top of that they can send the picture to your wife with a bill for $100 which the city splits with Grumman. LOL

No names are attached to phone numbers here. There aren't enough NSA or Service members in the world to listen to the content of the billions of daily calls. Hell it would take 3 full time snoopers just to monitor my niece's daily cellphone activity. Get a grip people, take a pill. Paranoia is not good for your blood pressure. (:^*)

[demlosers]

No names are attached to phone numbers here. There aren't enough NSA or Service members in the world to listen to the content of the billions of daily calls. Hell it would take 3 full time snoopers just to monitor my niece's daily cellphone activity. Get a grip people, take a pill. Paranoia is not good for your blood pressure. (:^*)

Dirtboy and Glenn seem to think having a name NOT cross referenced with a phone number for study violates the unreasonable search and seizure clause. And it does appear the Telicos agree on the legality of this issue with the Bush administration.