Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ndt
Also, there are two parties violating the law here. The telecoms and the feds.

Are you a telecom attorney?

If you're not, I'll wait to hear what the people who actually know what the law is, and means, have to say.

164 posted on 05/11/2006 2:58:04 PM PDT by sinkspur ( OK. You've had your drink. Now why don't you tell your Godfather what everybody else already knows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
"Are you a telecom attorney?"

The Law is the US Communications Act of 1934 and it's not particularly complicated although you seem to be having trouble reading it.

It very explicitly prevents the government from gathering personally identifiable information without a court order.

Here is is AGAIN for your reading pleasure. Please tell me how this can possibly be construed to mean the government can collect personally identifiable information without a court order.

(h) Disclosure of information to governmental entity pursuant to court order

A governmental entity may obtain personally identifiable information concerning a cable subscriber pursuant to a court order only if, in the court proceeding relevant to such court order -

* (1) such entity offers clear and convincing evidence that the subject of the information is reasonably suspected of engaging in criminal activity and that the information sought would be material evidence in the case; and

* (2) the subject of the information is afforded the opportunity to appear and contest such entity's claim.
170 posted on 05/11/2006 3:06:32 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson