Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NSA phone records story excites Washington(Trying to take down Michael Hayden)
Chicago Tribune ^ | 11 May 2006 | Frank James at 1:10 pm CDT

Posted on 05/11/2006 12:30:13 PM PDT by demlosers

Washington is agog today with the disclosure that appeared in USA Today that Verizon, AT&T and Bell South have been providing domestic phone call information to the National Security Agency on millions of residential and business phone calls made by Americans.

It’s all part of the spy agency’s quest to create a huge database of caller information it could data mine in order to find patterns that might reveal terrorist communications. But it has raised enormous privacy concerns in the minds of many.

The USA Today report, coming after last year’s disclosure in the New York Times of the NSA’s warrantless electronic surveillance of phone calls it deems to be connected to terrorism ginned up the debate over how far is too far in the Bush administration’s efforts to protect the American people from al Qaeda and other terrorists.

The newspaper’s disclosure modified a lot of plans today. President Bush, on his way to give a commencement address in Biloxi, Miss., stopped in the White House’s Diplomatic Reception Room to deliver a brief statement to the press.

By the way, the president’s rapid response was remarkable. When other bad news has hit, say Dubai Ports World or the initial revelations of the NSA surveillance last December, there was a noticeable lag which allowed White House critics to define the debate.

The president’s quickness before today might be attributable to Tony Snow, the new press secretary. Or it could be that the White House is so nervous about the president’s ever lower poll ratings that he and his advisors felt he had to speak and quickly.

PRESIDENT BUSH: After September the 11th, I vowed to the American people that our government would do everything within the law to protect them against another terrorist attack. As part of this effort, I authorized

(Excerpt) Read more at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: callrecords; echelon; freeperhysteria; michaelhayden; nsa; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-267 next last
To: dirtboy

People are defending it because "our people" are doing it. It is absolute bull crap. If Hillary & Bill ordered the NSA to record the numbers of every phone call made in the US, I am so fracking sure that people would be saying it was a good thing to piss on our rights.


101 posted on 05/11/2006 1:52:32 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

These numbers are only activity numbers. They don't know who owns them or who receives the call. These numbers distilled and analyzed for patterns. If a ‘known bad guy’ number is called they can cross check to see who else may be involved. This type of data mining does not identify anyone. I do not believe this is an infringement on our freedoms.
The danger lies in using this type of technology for personal purposes or to achieve an illegal objective. This would then be ‘unconstitutional’ / illegal.


102 posted on 05/11/2006 1:52:34 PM PDT by Lowell (The voice from beyond the far right edge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

Gawd, thank you! I'm glad there are still some folks here who get it.


103 posted on 05/11/2006 1:56:22 PM PDT by dirtboy (An illegal immigrant says my tagline used to be part of Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Lowell

> The danger lies in using this type of technology for personal purposes or to achieve an illegal objective. This would then be ‘unconstitutional’ / illegal.

BINGO! Maybe you trust the current folks in the govt to not abuse this information, but guess what-- the other party might get in, and how do you feel about THEM using this information? How do you think Hitlery would use it?

We have no way of knowing how this is being used/abused, only what they tell us.


104 posted on 05/11/2006 1:59:12 PM PDT by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
From the The communications act of 1934
"Civil action in United States district court; damages; attorney's fees and costs; nonexclusive nature of remedy...actual damages but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $100 a day for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is higher;"

Let's see $1000 X 10,000,000 thats 10 Billion dollars. Thats one heck of a class action lawsuit.
105 posted on 05/11/2006 2:02:40 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

Exactly.

I will give some scenarios. Corporate people bribing friends in government to find out which company is talking to whom.

Whistleblowers being exposed, both corporate and governmental. I am not talking National Security here. I am talking about a person who exposes cost overruns or something. All of this sitting in a databank, with only the programmers, and the administration in charge of it.

Stalkers could bribe their way in. They could access the numbers of friends of their victim. To figure out the victims new number and reverse trace it.

There are a ton of ways this can be abused. If they want to listen to Osama fine, but don't keep records of when I called my mother last. Big brother is here.


106 posted on 05/11/2006 2:04:21 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Lowell
The danger lies in using this type of technology for personal purposes or to achieve an illegal objective.

That is a danger, but IMO the greater danger is the government believing it can just get that kind of data with no probable cause. And at the end of the day, it IS a search when the government mines the data.

107 posted on 05/11/2006 2:04:47 PM PDT by dirtboy (An illegal immigrant says my tagline used to be part of Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; dogbyte12
In case you want to read more the US Communications Act of 1934.

One item to note. They ARE allowed to release information by court order BUT they must notify the customer they have done so. I didn't get my notice,did you?
108 posted on 05/11/2006 2:06:50 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ndt
They ARE allowed to release information by court order BUT they must notify the customer they have done so. I didn't get my notice,did you?

And I don't see a court order, either. So much for the claims of people here that I have no expectation of privacy when I use my phone.

109 posted on 05/11/2006 2:09:01 PM PDT by dirtboy (An illegal immigrant says my tagline used to be part of Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You are so stuck on yourself, you keep saying their compiling a list on YOU of YOUR yada yada yada. No they're not, it's got nothing to do with YOU. The NSA doesn't even know it's YOU. They don't know who the blank it is and they don't care. It is to see patterns of numbers calling other numbers, if anything looks tied to terrorism (and they have their intel ways of deciding), they can get a warrant to listen in. So your phone company may know you by name and account number but NSA does not, and could not care less. But go ahead and acuse the rest of us who aren't borderline of all kinds of stuff. I just consider the source and it rolls right off me.


110 posted on 05/11/2006 2:11:02 PM PDT by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Hilarious, what hysteria will break out on FR next week?

Could Bush be ANY MORE EVIL than he already is?

Can this evildoer even be human?


111 posted on 05/11/2006 2:11:43 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

It looks as if some "boys" here have no dealings with the IRS.


112 posted on 05/11/2006 2:13:21 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

MORE FAKE NEWS.

NEXT ... A FAKE POLL ON THE FAKE NEWS.


113 posted on 05/11/2006 2:14:24 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Let's see - since 9/11 the NSA has been monitoring phone conversations and since 9/11 there have been no further attacks within the US. Could there be a correlation there?


114 posted on 05/11/2006 2:16:38 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Former SAC Trained Killer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

If you base your rant on the limited bildge of an MSM liberal media source, you are a moron.

The MSM prints a story with their selective details.

The anti-American/'hope for dead troops' rag that is USA Today is the source.

Wait till the facts come out before you cry like Chris Matthews.


115 posted on 05/11/2006 2:17:07 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
You are so stuck on yourself, you keep saying their compiling a list on YOU of YOUR yada yada yada. No they're not, it's got nothing to do with YOU.

They have MY CALLING DATA. Without a SUBPEONA, without PROBABLE CAUSE, and without MY PERMISSION.

You may be willing to throw away your rights, but you do not have the perogative to throw mine away for me.

116 posted on 05/11/2006 2:18:22 PM PDT by dirtboy (An illegal immigrant says my tagline used to be part of Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ndt
They ARE allowed to release information by court order BUT they must notify the customer they have done so. I didn't get my notice,did you?

Not true.

117 posted on 05/11/2006 2:18:41 PM PDT by sinkspur ( OK. You've had your drink. Now why don't you tell your Godfather what everybody else already knows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: ndt

It's not illegal if the President says it's not.


118 posted on 05/11/2006 2:19:11 PM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Hilarious, what hysteria will break out on FR next week?

Read post #108 and get back to us, unless you prefer to remain ignorant of the larger underlying issues, which IMO is quite likely.

119 posted on 05/11/2006 2:19:17 PM PDT by dirtboy (An illegal immigrant says my tagline used to be part of Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Now who's the Moron..........????

You are, obviously. The mailing address on my bill is for my house. Not the NSA.

What is so hard about all this that your tiny mind can't process it?

And he/she was arguing that a phone book contains the same information that the NSA is gathering. That makes you a moron raised by a factor or so.

120 posted on 05/11/2006 2:19:33 PM PDT by Glenn (There is a looming Tupperware shortage. Plan appropriately.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson