Posted on 05/10/2006 10:21:43 PM PDT by demlosers
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon's top weapons buyer has endorsed a controversial plan that could lead to a multibillion-dollar U.S. missile defense component in space and strain ties with China, Russia and other countries.
At issue is what the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency calls a space-based "test bed." It would initially involve as few as one or two interceptor missiles designed to shoot down ballistic missiles possibly tipped with nuclear, chemical or germ warheads.
"I'm supportive of creating a test bed," Kenneth Krieg, undersecretary of defense for acquisition, told Reuters in an interview on Tuesday. "And then we'll see what we do with it afterwards."
The Missile Defense Agency plans to seek $45 million in seed money to start building the experimentation center in the fiscal year that starts October 1, 2007.
The project would gauge the value of putting interceptor missiles in space to strengthen the U.S. anti-ballistic missile shield being developed on the ground, at sea and aboard a modified Boeing Co. (NYSE:BA - News) jumbo jet equipped with an airborne laser.
Other companies with big missile-defense contracts include Lockheed Martin Corp. (NYSE:LMT - News), Northrop Grumman Corp. (NYSE:NOC - News), and Raytheon Co. (NYSE:RTN - News).
The Bush administration has been spending roughly $10 billion a year on all aspects of ballistic missile defense.
The space-based pilot project would involve just one or two "small scale" interceptors with no offensive capability, Lt. Gen. Henry Obering, head of the Missile Defense Agency, said in a September interview with Arms Control Today magazine.
CHINA, RUSSIA CONCERNS
Krieg said the project would create new missile-defense options, "and I think increasing the number of options we have to choose from is generally a good idea."
Critics say building such a facility may strain ties with countries such Russia and China that oppose the idea of weapons in space.
"The concern is that you're going to wind up spending a lot of money and all that's going to happen is you're going to have more nuclear weapons aimed at American cities," said John Pike of GlobalSecurity.org, an expert on space and weapons issues.
China and Russia probably would respond by deploying more long-range missiles "to make sure that our defense did not work against them," he said.
Calling it a "test bed" may not allay concerns since this is how a Fort Greely, Alaska, interceptor site was described before it in effect became operational, said Wade Boese, research director of the private Arms Control Association.
Obering made a similar point in the September 29 interview with Arms Control Today.
"I would anticipate that we would not have an operational space-based interceptor layer unless we needed it," he said. "But these defenses take time, so being able to go from a test bed into an operational status in a very short amount of time is something that is an advantage, not a disadvantage."
"The concern is that you're going to wind up spending a lot of money and all that's going to happen is you're going to have more nuclear weapons aimed at American cities"
Yeah, we don't want to intimidate the bullies.
The critics always seem worried about what Russia and China will think. Fact of the matter is they only oppose US weapons in space. They would be delighted to have their own. As it is, if the US did deploy a space-based defense layer, all China and Russia have to do is wait for the next democrat administration to take office and bribe them to give away the technology.
Why are we worrying about what our potential enemies are saying about OUR defense plans? When do you have to check with your enemies before finding new ways to defend yourself? Unless, of course, you work for the Carter Administration.
Hey, did you hear anythin about MAD? Surely not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.