Lacking that proof, you're just smearing Conservative Republican Tom Tancredo because you detest those who want the immigration laws enforced. Those who do so have overwhelming shown it is because they willingly commit these felonies themselves for personal gain, know others who have who are their friends or family members, and/or promote others to commit these felonies, as well.
Both sinkspur and Texasforever were both quite clear when they stated that they both not only knew they hired illegals, they bragged about it and encourage others to do likewise. That more than meets the threshold of "knowingly" or "reasonably should have known" standards in "enabling/harboring/hiring of an illegal" is absurd. Your attempts to equate what Conservative Republican Tom Tancredo has done (legally hiring a contractor and NOT hiring illegal aliens or even knowingly hiring illegal aliens) with what sinkspur and Texasforever practice and promote is transparently clear: an attempt to smear Conservative Republican Tom Tancredo with lies.
You have done nothing throughout this thread but champion absurdities, spin, lies, false accusations against Conservative Republican Tom Tancredo, me, and others with whom you disagree. You've claimed I "worship Trancredo" although it was not I who brought him up. The FROBL groupies have, for one reason and for one reason only: to justify lawbreaking by making this about Conservative Republican Tom Tancredo. I will state, yet again: this is NOT about Tom Tancredo, or you or your friends. It's about existing LAW and enforcing LAW. As it is written, those who break it commit felonies. It is irrelevant what Tom Tancredo says or does, what sinkspur says or does, what Texasforever says or does, or what you say or do. The law does not change according to ANY PERSON'S words or deeds. That makes me anything BUT a hypocrite, yet another unsubstantiated lie you repeat. Because your brain apparently is unable to grasp or comprehend, I repeat for at least the 15th time on this thread:
The fact remains quite simple: the law does not become void because x, y, or z individuals and companies break it. If that were the case, then all laws are meaningless (as they are all broken daily); and if all laws are void and should not be enforced because too many people break them, there would be no need for police, judges, juries, or a legal system.
That YOU continue to make this about personalities and persons, you obviously desire the law to distinguish between persons. But a law that is applied in that manner is not a law at all. Conservatives historically have sought to have the Rule of Law upheld, irrespective of persons.
And for that, it is YOU who are the hypocrite.
I am on the side of enforcing the laws, irrespective of who is in 'my' camp, irrespective of their name, age, rank, position, gender, location, faith, education, or political affiliation. It's about being on the side of law enforcement, not personalities. To claim that I have continued to maintain anything BUT that, it is also YOU who is the liar.
And yes, it's ALL right on this thread exactly what YOU and your groupies are.
I never said he did. I posted HIS OWN QUOTE saying it's not his responsibility to ask.
You're a hypocrite...quit fighting it, sheesh.
Sorry, I didn't read the rest of your deflection. ;)
Two thumbs up for you and Tom Tancredo.
Bush's speech tonight will alienate even more conservative Republicans.
I hope Tancredo will consider running for President in 2008.