The topic related to the language of and compliance with the immigration laws, the breaking of which are felonius acts, irrespective of persons.
Again, where in the law does it state that the guilt of an individual who "knowingly" or "reasonably should have known" that s/he is committing a felonious act is DEPENDENT upon whatever it may be that Tancredo says or does or does not say or do, and/or whether someone supports or doesn't support Tancredo? Whether I support Tom Tancredo or not has nothing to do with whether or not a person who commits a crime is guilty. Whether I even support the law, as it is written, is also irrelevant. The fact remains, the law, as it is written, makes the person who broke that law a person who committed a felony.
Now you're calling Tancy a felony?
Some loyal Conservative you are!