"Recognize the enemy for what he is and do not allow them to use divisive issues to destroy our conservative movement. We are winning. We must not be sidetracked by an issue that will be solved in due time as we elect more conservative members to our government and continue replacing liberal activist judges with constitutionalists."Posted on 05/11/2006 12:52:43 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
"Recognize the enemy for what he is and do not allow them to use divisive issues to destroy our conservative movement. We are winning. We must not be sidetracked by an issue that will be solved in due time as we elect more conservative members to our government and continue replacing liberal activist judges with constitutionalists."Posted on 05/11/2006 12:52:43 AM PDT by Jim Robinson"
If I am interpreting this post correctly, based on how you ALL are repeatedly using it, someone like me, who, despite having voted both times for President Bush, has supported him 100% with great admiration, respect, trust and loyalty, including Dubai, is now being described on my 'home' site, Free Republic, by Jim Robinson, as 'the enemy". "THE ENEMY"?.....because I happen to disagree with and feel completely let down, disappointed and betrayed by our President? At Free Republic, I am "the enemy" because post 9/11, I agree with the minutemen and I want our border effectively secured? I am "the enemy" because I want our immigration laws enforced and, I am "the enemy" because I do not want illegal aliens rewarded with 'earned' amnesty? I am "the enemy" because I believe that it is my President who has caused this divisiveness and I am "the enemy" because I am gravely concerned about the consequences of his having done so? I am "the enemy" because I dared to disagree with President Bush and did so at Free Republic?
This issue "may dissolve in due time", my dissapointment will not. I would appreciate knowing if this statement is being used in the proper context, as intended by the author and if my being offened is justified.
Thank you.