Is the U.S. Giving Mexico Intelligence about Americans?

NRO ^ | 05/10/2006 | Andrew C. McCarthy

[Dead Corpse]

No need to lie on my part. The truth is more than ample to smack you anti-rule of law types around.

[RodgerD]

This has been building to a head for 20 years and THIS President has a historical opportunity to do something about it.

And yet he'd rather suck up to open borders lobbyists and Vincente Fox than uphold this Nations laws and Constitution.

It is too bad that there seems to be a real leadership vacuum on this issue.

[Desron13]

This just in from Michelle's blog.

HOMELAND INSECURITY BULLETIN By Michelle Malkin · May 10, 2006 12:15 PM ***update from Daily Bulletin: " Scott James, a former Tucson agent, resigned after eight years of service in February, citing a lack of support for agents by the Department of Homeland Security. He said that U.S. Border Patrol officials provided office space inside their headquarters to Mexican consulate officials, allowed the consulate to dictate the agents' activities, and gave the consulate information on ongoing investigations. Such courtesies were not extended to consulate offices of other countries, James said."***

You want a reason? Treason is the reason!

[Desron13]

"What conservative would turn on the President and aid the RATS?"

I have not turned on the President. The President seems to have turned on me!

[justshutupandtakeit]

Let me know when the Sanctuary Cities no longer provide sanctuary and are willing to cooperate with immigration authorities.

This is all irrelevant in any case since most of those getting hysterical over this issue are the same ones who condemn the President over EVERY issue. The Perpetually Pissed Off can never be mollified.

[Dead Corpse]

There is plenty of leadership and an excellent leader to carry the day.

They are just marching in the WRONG direction is all. Get the straight on that, and things would be just peachy.

[Dead Corpse]

Sanctuary cities should lose all Federal funding for social programs and education. And I say that as someone who lives in a sanctuary city.

Nor have I gotten hysterical over EVERY issue relating to President Bush. In fact, I've supported him a number of times on a whole slew of issues. Your attempt at painting your ideological enemies on this not withstanding of course. But don't let a little thing like SLANDER slow you down.

[justshutupandtakeit]

I think twice before I believe such sources you should to. But it is soo much more fun to believe anything no matter how absurd from any source no matter how suspect which will exaggerate the "threat" of Illegals and the perfidy of the Administration.

[processing please hold]

You should know that any paper, radio, tv, blog, or forum that calls on the carpet what is really up with this issue of the US giving mexican authorities the whereabouts of our MM, is purely a leftist attempt to hurt Bush on this subject. They are all liars and cannot be trusted./sarc

[justshutupandtakeit]

Deportation is what happens after Illegals are DETAINED and that is almost always AT or NEAR the border. They don't just shoo 'em back across.

[justshutupandtakeit]

Not a "lunatic" just an Hysteric. Occassionally she has written some good stuff but now seems content to play to the Zealots.

[processing please hold]

The sad thing is that this report is unfortunately entirely consistent with GWB's strangely cozy relationship with the corrupt Vicente Fox and his cronies. I only wish it was unbelievable.

It is consistant with his policies, that's the sad part. May God help this country to survive.

[processing please hold]

*rolls eyes*

[William Terrell]

As a poster pointed out on another thread, The BP may be supplying the info to the State dept, and State is giving it to Mexico. That way, BP can legitimately say they didn't give it to Mexico.

[brytlea]

Oh, I've seen other examples of stupidity.
susie

[processing please hold]

LOL, and they think Michelle Malkin is a lunatic???

That I were blessed to be such a lunatic as she!!!! ;-)

[taxed2death]

"Nor have I gotten hysterical over EVERY issue relating to President Bush. In fact, I've supported him a number of times on a whole slew of issues. Your attempt at painting your ideological enemies on this not withstanding of course. But don't let a little thing like SLANDER slow you down."

___________________________________________________________

Same here, I support GWB 100% with few exceptions... those exceptions being:

1.Lack of border security.

2.faux Amnesty... or "earned citizenship" as he likes to put it.

3. Budget


My minor pet peeves >>>>>> appointing Chertoff / Gonzales and the young lady (name escapes me) who obviously got her position because of crony ism.

His court nominations are second to none.....highly commendable.

[Dead Corpse]

He's a little light on 2A issues, but he hasn't done anything to make things worse. I'll give him credit for that as well.

[brytlea]

I suppose it makes you feel like you're doing an amazing job of debating, but really, some of your comments (like the one this is addressed to) make you sound like a teenage boy. I'm sure you're not, and I'm sure you can actually make cogent points without stooping to vulgar remarks. Why not do that?
susie

[justshutupandtakeit]

I agree wrt to the Sanctuary cities.

There is no slander involved. You may be an exception but I have seen the same names opposing Bush on most issues that I have seen hyperventilating over this one.
Invariably they ignore the political realities of the electorate and push for candidates who would not stand a prayer of being elected in a national election or even a state one. There is no realism in those who believe Alan Keyes or equivalent is actually a viable candidate ANYWHERE. And I like the guy.

To them EVERYONE is a RINO unless they agree with the lunatic fringe of the lunatic fringe. I am merely in the lunatic fringe but recognize that the nation is not conservative and hence conservatives will NOT get their way everytime. The transition away from the mentality of the last 50 years will take decades more.