Oh, and...
One of the ongoing complaints from the left is that Diebold refused to release the listing of its software. Which, if you think about it, is exactly what a hacker would need in order to reprogram the machine. So, by demanding the software be public, they're increasing the vulnerabilities of the system, which they can then complain about.
Same ole' left, always wants it both ways.
There is no other way to confirm its security.
As I said earlier, North Carolina wanted to audit their software, but Diebold didn't let them, and got certified anyway.
Which, if you think about it, is exactly what a hacker would need in order to reprogram the machine.
How do hackers manage to break into Windows servers so often?