The "interlocking evidence" all related to consular reporting, which is tied to consular treaties that we have ratified and are thus the supreme law of the land along with the Constitution. Amazing that she ignored that stuff, eh? I guess it must be too dry and dull to get a "BUSH IS EVIL INCARNATE" rant out of.
with the single exception of the one detail you have experience with definitely puts you in one of those categories.
Some people (you in particular and Ms. Carter, apparently) have a real problem when they learn that they don't know what they're talking about.
You can keep saying it, but you can't make it true. "Consular reporting" has become your magic wand. You seem to think you can make everything else disappear by using it as your rubric.
Kind of like the official line.
Unfortunately, the official line isn't tying up all the loose ends. You may be an expert in arithmetic, but you're out of your depth when you start claiming "you can't do math with letters instead of numbers."
Nobody can force you to draw reasonable inferences from less than comprehensive evidence, but neither can you prevent thinking people from drawing inferences by disdaining with less than comprehensive evidence.
I may not know what I'm talking about, but you certainly haven't demonstrated it.
It's not like one can cite an official form that gets filled out when a government agency decides to engage in malfeasance.
Finally, I'm beginning to have serious questions as to whether your tangential experience in this area has left you "invincibly ignorant" for the purpose of assimilating new information.