Skip to comments.
Star Wars Now - Missile defense is on its way to becoming a reality.
The Weekly Standard ^
| 05/07/2006
| James Thayer
Posted on 05/09/2006 3:58:50 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: ClaireSolt
To: neverdem
"It'll never work. Star Wars is just a fantasy of Ronny Raygun. You can't hit a bullet with a bullet." </Idiot Leftist>
22
posted on
05/09/2006 5:00:48 PM PDT
by
Monitor
(Gun control isn't about guns; it's about control.)
To: kinoxi
23
posted on
05/09/2006 5:06:53 PM PDT
by
anymouse
To: neverdem
24
posted on
05/09/2006 5:09:02 PM PDT
by
wjcsux
(I would prefer to have the German army in front of me than the French army behind me- Gen. G. Patton)
To: neverdem
25
posted on
05/09/2006 5:11:40 PM PDT
by
wjcsux
(I would prefer to have the German army in front of me than the French army behind me- Gen. G. Patton)
To: neverdem
26
posted on
05/09/2006 5:11:43 PM PDT
by
wjcsux
(I would prefer to have the German army in front of me than the French army behind me- Gen. G. Patton)
To: neverdem
This makes me sooooo happy!
To: Commander8
28
posted on
05/09/2006 5:19:20 PM PDT
by
359Henrie
(We cannot deport 12 million can we? Si, se puede!)
To: neverdem
As an engineer, I worked on the Missile Defense program.
Truly a great feat of engineering. However, we shouldn't get too complacent. There are ways to counter the missile defense system, although this requires some sophistication on the part of the aggressor. Work still needs to be done.
Obviously, I'm not going to talk about that here.
To: dighton
Thanks for the ping. All you really need to know to realize that this is nearly there are two words: "post-apogee intercept." You may absolutely depend on Japan being vitally interested. They've already been overflown once. That we know about.
Back when I was a Navy missileer three decades ago a "skin-to-skin" at maximum range was the ne plus ultra of the field. It is simply hard to explain how difficult this is or how good you have to be to bring it off. My congrats to all involved. We may be needing this, and if we do, we'll need it badly.
To: RHINO369
The are called ballistic missiles for a reason. Their tracks can be plotted very quickly from radar data.
One would not mistake the flight path and speed of an ICBM for a manned space launch.
SM-3s fly REALLY fast also. They would know it's not an ICBM.
31
posted on
05/09/2006 5:40:53 PM PDT
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: RHINO369
32
posted on
05/09/2006 5:42:33 PM PDT
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: neverdem
in 1985 an aide to House Armed Services Committee Chairman Les Aspin, the Wisconsin Democrat,
Sorry to speak of the dead, but, what these idiots don't understand is that Star Wars and the B-2 accomplished their missions before they were deployed. These systems scared the borscht out of the Soviets and we won the cold war through military econonmics. It exposed the Soviets as (to steal a quote) a very strong arm with a very weak body.
33
posted on
05/09/2006 5:57:05 PM PDT
by
tang-soo
(Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
To: neverdem
Remember the scoffing when Ronald Reagan first proposed a ballistic missile defense? A typical example: in 1985 an aide to House Armed Services Committee Chairman Les Aspin, the Wisconsin Democrat, announced, "Star Wars research is an imprudent use of taxpayers' dollars. By continuing it, we're essentially throwing money into a bottomless pit." The skepticism continues. In 2004, Eugene Habiger, who headed the U.S. Strategic Command in the mid-1990s, said, "A system is being deployed that doesn't have any credible capability." And the Union of Concerned Scientists--who else?--recently issued a tract claiming that there is "no basis for believing the system will have any capability to defend against real attack."
To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
Thank you Mr. President. Thank you.
35
posted on
05/09/2006 7:42:56 PM PDT
by
MattinNJ
(Allen/Pawlenty in 08-play the map.)
To: BRITinUSA
Ah yes, I feel so much safer now we have a missile shield Then I suggest you scurry on back to your British Isles where you'll undoubtedly feel much safer!
36
posted on
05/10/2006 4:10:52 AM PDT
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
To: aculeus
BTW, isn't interesting how the "everyone hates us" claque always manages to ignore one billion Indians? The USSR had a lock on that country not long ago and our really really dumb President has managed to turn them into a virtual ally. Not too shabby for a dumb cowboy, huh?
37
posted on
05/10/2006 4:13:47 AM PDT
by
Coop
(Proud founding member of GCA - Gruntled Conservatives of America)
To: neverdem
![](http://www.timelinestudios.com/images/plates/deathstar.jpg)
Did someone say star wars?
38
posted on
05/10/2006 4:23:49 AM PDT
by
Trueblackman
(Terrorism and Liberalism never sleep and neither do I)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson