As for your court of law arguments...LOL, you seem to forget that "facts" are important...and Tancredo demonstrated none whatsoever.
Once again you are talking without backup. If I acted as an investigator I would want all the witnesses and all the testimony prepared for resolution.
Tell us which facts you know.
But maybe I have "gone too hard on you". Do you like it? Does it make you feel good? Are you a better human being for it?
The fact is I chose to "go hard on you" to show you what your own thoughts can produce. Are we unified? Do we agree on anything?
Yes this policy of "going hard on folks" is a real winner.
So you think Tancredo is the culprit here. How about answering the question put to you before. If Tancredo is speaking from a false set of facts, who put those facts before him? Are you concerned about that? Or are you just content to "go hard on him"?.