Coulter's hottest book ever - 'Godless: The Church of Liberalism' takes on Darwin

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | May 9, 2006

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

PLEASE VISIT -

[Conservative Coulter Fan]

BUMP ALERT!

[wideawake]

But, but Ann is an urbane, Northeastern conservative!

She may have a sharp wit, but doessn't she really - deep down inside - look down on all those dirty rednecks and superstitious Italian grandmamas like we do?

She can't actually believe the Bible is true, can she?

[kinghorse]

I've stated this many times before and I'll state it again. Liberals believe man is inately "good" and doesn't need to be taught morality. At the same time liberals repudiate a higher power in favor of natural selection. Religious dogma or at least Christianity implores us to act less animalistic and more "God-like". Go tell a liberal this and they will tell you that's a bunch of hooey.

Okay then, if we are to endulge our animalism over a higher calling, please do not bitch when one tribe attempts to exert it's influence over another. It's natural selection in action. You cannot have it both ways.

[Abcdefg]

I predict much heat and little light will be generated on this thread!

[freespirited]

Liberals' absolute devotion to Darwinism, Coulter shows, has nothing to do with evolution's scientific validity and everything to do with its refusal to admit the possibility of God as a guiding force.

I hope this is an inaccurate characterization of her book. If it is accurate, she is going to look very foolish.

[ClearCase_guy]

Liberals' absolute devotion to Darwinism, Coulter shows, has nothing to do with evolution's scientific validity and everything to do with its refusal to admit the possibility of God as a guiding force. They will brook no challenges to the official religion.

Yup.

[keithtoo]

What are her actual sales numbers? I was beginning to worry that this latest book was not selling well.

[mlc9852]

How will she look foolish?

[stinkerpot65]

Liberals' absolute devotion to Darwinism, Coulter shows, has nothing to do with evolution's scientific validity and everything to do with its refusal to admit the possibility of God as a guiding force. They will brook no challenges to the official religion.

Not the mention the reason Nasa is desperately spending billions in a search for life on Mars.

[kinghorse]

And if you as a liberal declares it immoral to exert your superiority over another animal in the kingdom of animals, you the liberal are being a good Christian. You just don't know it. Yet.

Repudiate your belief in Evolution or accept it's outcome.

[Boiler Plate]

Ahhh, Now you your just gonna get all the Darwin worshipers all upset. How long do you think before the first insults are hurled?

[cryptical]

I hope this is an inaccurate characterization of her book. If it is accurate, she is going to look very foolish.

It's a nice strawman that the theocons like setting up and knocking down...

[Shadowfax]

"I hope this is an inaccurate characterization of her book. If it is accurate, she is going to look very foolish."

To those who dogmatically embrace the religious doctrine of evolution. Doesn't mean she isn't right, though.

Further, to those of us who understand that evolution is a religious doctrine rather than a valid scientific theory, her book will be a breath of fresh air. Personally, I'm really looking forward to this one. Nice to know that Ann continues in her habit of being right about everything.

[AntiGuv]

"Mindless" would be a better title so far as the creationist nonsense goes. Check out my tagline for further details.

[Michael.SF.]

I have long thought and so stated in this forum, that we need to use the argument of "Church and State" to combat liberalism's encroachment of the ideology on our children. They absolutely do treat their philosophy as if it were a religion. Glad to see that the renowned Ms. Coulter has come to the same conclusion.

The left is absolutely ahead of us in their ability to change our language and twist meanings (i.e. Affirmative Action), we need to come up with a phrase that allows for a redefinition of religion, not based on a Spiritual entity, but based on a dogmatic life philosophy.

If we could do this, then all of their arguments against the introduction of God into the classroom would be turned against them when they introduce their nondiety religious philosophy.

[dead]

Writing with a keen appreciation for genuine science

Let me venture a guess - "genuine science" just happens to be "science" that sees the world as Ann would like the world to be. What a coinky-dink.

I’m embarrassed for her.

[Nathan Zachary]

If Humans are animals, then aren't animals humans? It only stands to reason.

[steve-b]

I see that Coulter's undernourished body has finally resorted to burning brain tissue to keep itself going.

[Antonello]

I have not yet read 'Godless'. Can anyone here that has confirm whether evolution is actually in the book, or is merely another creative addition from the WND?