Skip to comments.
I'm more upset with Conservatives than I am with George W. Bush
Posted on 05/08/2006 7:04:26 PM PDT by mwfsu84
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 1,201-1,204 next last
To: mwfsu84
First, mwfsu84, it's good to see you on this forum, my Nole friend. This is UGAmbaFSUjd.
Second, I would not have believed our "WOT President" would be so determined to leave our borders wide open to any terrorists with the resources to walk over. They have. I'm waiting for it. And I've had enough of GWB's rhetoric and the party machine's disdain for conservatism. The only way to engineer change, after 3 decades of trying, is to let the party crumble for awhile and for the nation to once again learn the distinction, a la Carter/Reagan.
Don't weep for the GOP blind loyalists. They brought it on themselves.
To: Texasforever
We're getting a lot of DU and Kos trash here in the last couple of months. They're pretty easy to spot.
102
posted on
05/08/2006 7:28:08 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
To: FreeReign
They actually believe that this country is just thirsting for John Birch Society "conservatism".
103
posted on
05/08/2006 7:28:21 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: RobbyS
Let's just start with the borders. The overwhelming majority of the voters want it secured. Politiicians throughout both parties all say they want it secured. And yet, nothing happens, because they insist on making it contingent on amnesty, instead of securing the border first before moving on to amnesty. So it can't be that hard for a candidate who intends to do the right thing on the border to get votes.
104
posted on
05/08/2006 7:28:34 PM PDT
by
inquest
(If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
To: SunnyD1182
That's ideally how it should be. But when said anti-
American anti-soldier quasi-socialist Democrats are being opposed by "Democrats Lite," it doesn't really inspire a lot of enthusiasm. I really think a case can be made that we may be better off with a split government, because then at least the President may utilize the veto pen. He seems to be afraid to do it as long as Republicans are in charge of Congress.
That sounds quite reasonable and typically it would be somewhat reasonable....however not now! Not during a war! and certainly not with what IS the ilk of the current democrat party. A party (sponsored by a MSM) that is completely anti-military, anti-American and anti-success in the WOT.
Again, our soldiers alone deserve better then to have their citizens back State side stick a knife in their backs by putting these type people in a majority of Congress....simply because of personal narrow politics about being upset with the GOP.
It is foolishness to suggest such action.
Best regards,
To: mwfsu84
presidential impeachment over bogus charges OMG there's a sex scandal in the works too Oh my
106
posted on
05/08/2006 7:28:47 PM PDT
by
MilspecRob
(Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
To: mwfsu84
I became a Republican, and my very first vote was for Ronald Reagan. I am a Conservative and will vote so! If the Republican leave the Conservative movement, I leave the Republicans. Period.
107
posted on
05/08/2006 7:28:48 PM PDT
by
TheHound
(You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
To: Texasforever
They think Hillary and First Husband Bill will save them, lol!
To: Sloth
I will hold my nose and vote for Robin Hayes. I will not stab my former soldiers in the back by helping to elect the 'cut and run Dems'. I won't allow them to waste the blood of my former battle buddies. Vote 3rd party if you wish or don't vote at all if you must. But when the Dems gain their majority and our proud men and women are forced from the field of battle against the Fascists. Please remember remember this in the future. Churchill mentioned something about "This being their finest hour!" It will be past tense rather than future tense if the Dems take either house. So it maybe futile, but i'll soldier on.
To: sinkspur
If these moonbat conservatives end up costing us the 2006 elections, I suggest we never support one of theirs again either.
110
posted on
05/08/2006 7:29:22 PM PDT
by
staytrue
(Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
To: Sloth
So whats your solution, hand the power over to the Dems and hope they f@#k up the country enough that people will move to the right? Do you also support blowing up a few more buildings in NYC to get people to understand why we need to fight the WOT?
While I agree the current administration is not even close to representing their base, sometimes you have to vote for the lesser of two evils. So go ahead and vote 3rd party if you feel you have to, just don't come complaining on these forums when the country is run by the RATs.
111
posted on
05/08/2006 7:29:45 PM PDT
by
KurtZ
To: inquest
"You're right. Staying home is stupid. I intend to vote third-party instead."
What an original idea! Wait, no it isn't! I believe that's the way we got Bill Clinton for eight years and just about destroyed this country. I guess you'll be happy to see Hillary complete the job.
I couldn't believe it when many conservatives voted for the third party ticket--TWICE! And I am astounded that it would be considered the thing to do less than six years later. Don't people ever learn (rhetorical question).
You are kidding yourself if you think there is a third party strong enough to win against the Democrats.
To: FreeReign
Evidence that the threat isn't being felt strongly enough yet.
113
posted on
05/08/2006 7:30:39 PM PDT
by
inquest
(If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
To: sinkspur
We're getting a lot of DU and Kos trash here in the last couple of months. They're pretty easy to spot.
....and what's with the old sign-up dates?
114
posted on
05/08/2006 7:30:57 PM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(Army Wife and Army Mother.....toughest job in the military)
To: Sloth
Must deduct two points for your use of the word, "incentivized"
Then I have to deduct 98 points for yur logic.
Sorry, but that leaves you with a grade of zero.
115
posted on
05/08/2006 7:31:02 PM PDT
by
altura
(Bushbot No. 1 - get in line.)
To: nj26
And what exactly is Tom Kean Jr. going to do for the War on Terror? Maybe he can contribute to the War on Terror like his father by writing another 9/11 report trashing the Pentagon. Read my post #105 -
But even more simply put if Tom Kean Jr. simply kept the anti-military, anti-success in the WOT democrat ilk out of the majority (via whom he would caucus with) that alone would be a simply a victory enough.
This is not the time to put the democrats in power. We are at war. Our soldiers alone deserve better.
To: mwfsu84
I limited my comments to your assertion that if the 'rats take control on congress, President Bush
will be impeached.
The 'rats may try, but it will never happen.
You'd do well to try and keep up with what is being said to you and it what context it's being said.
To: mwfsu84
I keep getting mail from the GOP, and it keeps helping me offset the higher heating costs through serving as kindling.
118
posted on
05/08/2006 7:31:42 PM PDT
by
CT
To: roses of sharon
They think Hillary and First Husband Bill will save them, lol! No they don't they just want their 2 minutes of hate. If it wasn't Bush or The GOP in general it would be the next group that they can blame their pathetic lives on.
119
posted on
05/08/2006 7:31:42 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: Sloth
Nonsense. Taking votes away from the GOP is the only way to incentivize it to move rightward, in order to regain our votes. If the GOP knows they'll get conservative votes no matter what, then it is only incentivized to move leftward in an effort to get 'centrist' votes. ; Actually, the GOP has to be in control for you to have any chance to get the results you want. And in the meantime, while they're out power, the Democratic Congress can do a great deal of damage to this country - damage that can not be undone overnight. Don't believe me? Look at what four years of Jimmy Carter did to this country - we're paying for his mistakes to this day.
120
posted on
05/08/2006 7:31:44 PM PDT
by
mwfsu84
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 1,201-1,204 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson