To: gidget7
But giving them "domestic partnerships" is the same thing as being married. Just a different name for it...
111 posted on
05/08/2006 6:57:05 PM PDT by
RebekahT
("Our government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan)
To: RebekahT
"But giving them "domestic partnerships" is the same thing as being married. Just a different name for it...:
Yes of course it would. They have always had access to power of atty, leaving property in wills, etc. They are not denied any rights at all.
114 posted on
05/08/2006 7:05:47 PM PDT by
gidget7
(PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
To: RebekahT
Here's the question/issue nobody addresses: Every day legally ordained clergy perform "weddings" for gay couples. The unions, of course, are not recognized by the gubmint.
So, should these clergy be banned from conducting the services? And what defines a marriage -- gubmint recognition or the blessing of clergy?
115 posted on
05/08/2006 7:07:43 PM PDT by
durasell
(!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson