"Is this your idea of moral equivalence? Homosexuality is morally equivalent to killing someone or being a dictator?"
No, it's my idea of moral inequivalence.
Please see my post 29. There is not equivocation intended in my post whatsoever outside of the common theme of a parent feeling shame over the actions of a child.
If anything, my post is a question of degree. But even if it were an equivocation, how would saying that a parent's love trumping a child's actions (be it murder or homosexuality) make my post even worth commenting on?
Further, I pondered if a dictator's parents could view that child's actions with shame, which given the nature of my post, would certainly not imply equivocation.
Thanks for the clarification