To: aNYCguy
I have provided two references for multiple observed instances. That is sufficientWOW! Two references to back up the lie of evolution. If your references stated what was speciated it went beyond me. Saying that there is enough data elsewhere is a copout by the scientists in your "referenced article.I herefore consider your speciation argument garbage.
To: taxesareforever
Two references to back up the lie of evolution.
You are again asserting that evolution is a lie without having supported that assertion. You are also misrepresenting the nature of the references that I provided. You presented a specific claim. The references that I have provided demonstrate the claim to be false.
If your references stated what was speciated it went beyond me.
Your inability or unwillingness to comprehend the references does not refute them.
Saying that there is enough data elsewhere is a copout by the scientists in your "referenced article.
You are applying a different standard of evidence than is required to falsify the original claims. The original claim is that no speciation events have been observed. The existence of even one observed speciation event falsifies the claim. I have provided references for more than one such observed event; thus your claim is demonstrated to be false.
I herefore consider your speciation argument garbage.
This statement demonstrates only that you are unwilling to consider that you are incorrect, as you have shown no fault with the references that I have provided.
482 posted on
06/03/2006 6:44:45 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson